• InsertUser@en.osm.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    @NeatNit @gedaliyah @openstreetmap

    F-Droid do provide more detail about why they warn that something has an anti-feature, but only make that easily accessible if you run their code natively on your device. If you’re on the web interface you have to figure out which of the links in the external links section isn’t actually external and look in there.

    Their excuse for this is that their website can’t parse their own file format that they invented for themselves.

        • InsertUser@en.osm.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          @NeatNit @openstreetmap

          I would assume the same as the reason for warning about this in the first place? They don’t seem to like devs tying things back to preset websites and think it deserves a massive warning icon.

          • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            There is no option for a tiny warning icon, all AFs get the same treatment - this might be a bad design, but there’s no bad intentions behind it.

            This isn’t about what they like devs doing. It’s about informing users about how the app works and what it does.

            If they didn’t want Organic Maps on F-Droid, they’d just kick them off. There have been plenty of opportunities for them to do it and seem justified, i.e. “we are removing Organic Maps from F-Droid forever because its devs are constantly complaining, causing us extra work and drama in long fruitless discussions”. The opportunity to do that was explicit in the discussions and they didn’t take it.

            • InsertUser@en.osm.town
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              @NeatNit @openstreetmap
              switching topics again are we?

              They rolled out a massive new warning type and then didn’t have all their apps accept it as OK. That is a deliberate choice. It is their ecosystem from top to bottom, they *chose* not to have the TetheredNet added to the list of allowed warnings in existing installs. If they hadn’t wanted to make that choice they should have done the responsible thing and held the rollout until their app supported it.