cm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 days agoHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.deexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1213cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldsteam@lemmy.mlsteam@programming.devopensource@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1213external-linkHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.decm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldsteam@lemmy.mlsteam@programming.devopensource@lemmy.ml
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 day agoThat’s a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.
That’s a passive cable and would require DP++. Funnily enough it would also require a HDMI 2.1 capable driver.