• lavienG@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Perhaps Linux needs a more robust software ecosystem? Just a layman here, so please correct me if I’m mistaken.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It does, but this is a vicious cycle: small market share → devs don’t release Linux versions for their software → the software ecosystem is fragile → users who’d rather use Linux still need to use Windows → small market share. Anything countering any of those “links” weakens the vicious cycle, including Microsoft pissing off some Windows users; that’s why the penguin gets smug, because they know “Winrows is now an Agenric OS lol lmao” means slightly higher Linux market share.

      • lavienG@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a very comprehensive take. So, looking at it this way, it’s perhaps neither the system’s fault nor the user’s, but more like a ‘product of its time’.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          a ‘product of its time’.

          Something like this, indeed. Or more like a product of the situation, plus a few laws - like network effect (the value a user derives from the OS depends on the number of users using it).

          Note that not even the devs are to blame for this; it makes sense someone releasing commercial software would focus on the 70% (Windows), sometimes on the 15% (Mac OS), but almost never on the 4% (Linux).