[Sorry for the double reply]

*slow clap*

I’m not completely opposed to people using large models as a writing aid, specially for technical stuff. However: if you’re publishing a scientific paper, it’s your job to check it twice, thrice, tenice ten times, to ensure all info there is accurate, factual, and well grounded. If you can’t do it, you shouldn’t be littering the commons with your rubbish.

That applies even to references. In fact, references are part of the process: knowledge isn’t born ex bloody nihilo dammit, people should be able to check the references of your paper and find earlier literature about the subject.

[Justin Angel] My guess is that this policy will be applied selectively depending on institutional privilege and personal notoriety. It’ll end up as a tool of silencing unconnected individuals vs. promoting better scientific discourse. // I aspire to be wrong.

Doesn’t it sound weird that someone immediately assumes (i.e. makes up) the policy will be implemented unfairly, as soon it is announced? Well, if you check their profile, it doesn’t:

Justin Angel // @JustinAngel // AI, iOS & Android dev. Worked at Meta, Uber, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft building apps, developer platforms, and hardware. Tweeting about LLM psychotherapy.

Plus almost all of their tweets are about LLMs. This stinks “competing interests” from a distance.

It’s actually harsher than it looks like: “followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”

This means that, for all intents and purposes, if you get caught by this policy, you’re permanently banned from submitting preprints to arXiv, even if those are the main appeal of the repository.

Good to know, since I have both peppermint and red peppers in my garden. And I actually use both together often, with either ground meat or aubergines. (Plus cumin. Lots of. It goes great with both.)

Abo-meow-nya-tion.

Funny (but not surprising) that Gilbert immediately caught what Stanley was up to: Stanley is trying to give Pride the freedom to marry whoever she wants.

Also, Pride, come on… you know you ain’t your game counterpart. You’re just some Earthling baka. Chill, no need to blame yourself for what you didn’t.

I’m not a biologist either, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

But it still points the no life / life transition being extremely easy? Doesn’t it?

Perhaps so, provided the conditions are suitable for that.

In special, going from free-floating to contained self-replicating junk seems to be a damn big leap, since the containment (aka membrane) needs to be selective: it needs to let some material to go in/out to allow replication and get rid of leftovers, but not enough to threat the integrity of the structure.

It was still most likely a hellscape for our standards, though. Just not a barren one.

300 million years is still a lot of time, even evolutionarily speaking. For reference, it’s ~twice the time between us and our last common ancestor with platypuses (160mya). Plus I kind of expect this sort of barely celular… being? structure? that gave origin to the LUCA to evolve way faster.

And more importantly, it means the LUCA wasn’t the only one around those times. It was part of some sort of ecosystem already. Alongside a bunch of less lucky siblings.

To be clear: the LUCA is the last universal common ancestor. There was earlier life, before the LUCA; it’s just that all its surviving descendants are also LUCA descendants.

This is important to know while reading the text, because it explains why the LUCA was so surprisingly complex.

With 32 GB system RAM, Microsoft believes that the games can have more “breathing room”.

There’s no such thing as “breathing room”, dammit. Once you set up 32 GB as standard, shitty / assumptive developers are going to say “well, we assooooome users have 32 GB. It would be a waste to design the game to use less than that lol lmao”. Specially devs doing the same as Microslop, and using AI shitty code to pump out code faster than humans can desloppify.

System monitor says I’m running 12GB, but there’s a lot of unnecessary stuff open, and last time I restarted this machine is 4 days ago. Plus at this rate my computer is basically a server, and since I already have 32 GB I don’t care too much about memory management any more.

I found the recipe! Might try my hand at it, it’s Autumn here and the recipe looks good. (I might end using butternut squash instead though.)

Giving free access to a tool you can’t rely on, over a system you must rely on. What could go wrong? /s

Plus come on, even my personal files get a monthly backup, and I’m damn sloppy*.

Ah, and like others said: Claude didn’t “confess” anything. A confession is an acknowledgement of something you’ve done but you’d rather avoid others knowing, good luck claiming a bot has a mental model of people like we do.

*currently using a single off-site backup, a USB stick. This will change in a few days, as my new hard disk pops up; the old one will be used for, among other things, backup of important files. Then I’ll get a bona fide 3-2-1.

Ah, it’s tin pest? (I’m watching the video right now.)

Same “basic” idea, of a vicious cycle. Except you don’t need reaction with an external substance, like oxygen; the catalyst for tin pest is even more tin. (That means the blob over the cube of metal is likely a piece of grey tin. You could use germanium instead but eh, it’s more expensive.)

EDIT: check luciole’s comment, the cover is likely tin undergoing tin pest, not aluminium.

The cover picture is likely gallium over aluminium, unrelated to medication. Metallic aluminium is surprisingly reactive, but usually you don’t notice it because it’s covered with a layer of oxide; so in the presence of certain other metals you get a vicious cycle, like:

• gallium leaks past the oxide layer, and forms an alloy with the aluminium
• aluminium in the alloy gets exposed to the air, so it becomes oxide
• the alloy kicks the oxide out, because it stopped being a metal
• now gallium is free to form an alloy with even more metallic aluminium

It also works with mercury. The metal, not this one.

Now I’m going to watch the video. Sorry. I just had to babble about metals, plus aluminium fuckery brings me childhood memories (not even joking).

RIP, apparently 😔

…wow. I wasn’t aware of that at all. But the forums confirm it, and Battosay wouldn’t joke about it. :-/

May he rest in peace.

Anyway. Now thinking, most of his takes were spot on, and proved true later on: Minecraft wasting huge amounts of dev time on pathfinding for pets and then testificates, Forge becoming a drama-generating machine, and, more on-topic, Molyneux.

Epic is evil while Ubisoft is just incompetent

Incompetence is a form of evil. Put them both in the same square.

Lemme quote a Minecraft forums post:

Now, I’m going to take an educated guess here and say that Peter Molyneux is probably the developer in question that suggested these things [that Notch should add pets to Minecraft]. It’s right up his ally [SIC - alley].

A couple of things to keep in mind with Molyneux: he has great ideas, but his ideas are often way overly ambitious. This is why his games are constantly very late and way over budget. While he’s brilliant, he also has a tendency to go way off on design tangents that keep his development teams spinning in circles.

This is from 2011. Fifteen years ago, at least professional game designers (like the OP from that quote, FlowerChild) were already aware Molyneux is an “ideas guy”. He pictures huuuuuge, world-changing games that are unfeasible. Couple this with anything related to RL money and guess what, you’ll get people losing money.

In-App Purchases
Requires 3rd-Party Account
Uses Kernel Level Anti-Cheat
Requires agreement to a 3rd-party EULA

Smells like gacha from a distance. Hard pass.