Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they’re founded upon.
Yeah, I know you don’t. I’ll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it’d go over your head and you’d play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.
I notice you haven’t replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I’m saying here, and goes into more details about why you’re full o’ crap - if you’re so interested in an “adult conversation” why haven’t you just gone to engage with them instead?
Sounds like you aren’t able to come up with a response to any of my points, so I’ll just assume you’re out of your depths here. Horrible.
Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they’re founded upon.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. Let me know when you’re ready for an adult conversation.
Yeah, I know you don’t. I’ll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it’d go over your head and you’d play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.
I notice you haven’t replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I’m saying here, and goes into more details about why you’re full o’ crap - if you’re so interested in an “adult conversation” why haven’t you just gone to engage with them instead?