• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If you click into it and read right through, you may find it a more sensible and robust definition than the cambridge one with all its “gooder” and “badder”. ;)

    Neither are great though.

    • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Definition 2 is the closest to the way that relatively is used in most speech and it still uses “relation” in its definition. I don’t love the Cambridge one but it is better than the MW one.