Our long history of violating international law continues…

  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    No governments would ever consider this piracy because it’s not.

    Since it was done using the military it’s an act of war

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes. And those are privately owned vessels acting under a government’s letter of marque. Private, it’s in the name. :)

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Warships are by definition owned and operated by a government. Privateers are private vessels operating under cover of law by a government.

            So, yeah? Warships cannot commit piracy, technically. Really, the whole conversation here is about words and meanings.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes I have. Privateers are private individuals that commit piracy on behalf of the state.

        The US did not hire or sanction a mercenary group to take this tanker.

        The US used its military. That makes it not piracy, but that does make it an act of war