ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1477file-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.dev
arrow-up1477external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square119fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.dev
minus-squareonlooker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 hours agoUgh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.
minus-squareslappyfuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoBack in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide? A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.
Ugh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.
Back in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide?
A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.