• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That is not what i was asking. I’m not negative here (if it sounds like). Besides supporting legacy old 32 bit libraries, are there reasons why someone want to go 64-bit only?

    • GreyCat@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Some bug and issues only appear on 32-bit architectures, so you do have to test for both. Which is a strain, for only such a amall userbase.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        But what part does apply to the Steam app itself? I am aware of benefits of 64-bit. If you guys don’t know or don’t want to answer, then why even bother with replies like these? What is the 64-bit executable worth for the Steam app specifically? Besides getting rid of old libraries. Does the steam app has any benefits from 64-bit?

        • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          You did not ask about steam specifically, I’ll Google that for you as well. Why is Steam moving to full 64-bit and dropping 32-bit OS support?

          Future versions of Steam will only support 64-bit OS’ moving forward. Why? The simple answer is that planned platform upgrades and core features of Steam rely on drivers and other libraries that only support 64-bit OS’. Future versions of Steam will only support 64-bit OS’. That means that users of 32-bit OS’ should upgrade their systems. Valve recommends that users do this “sooner rather than later”.

          You can join the discussion on Steam’s 64-bit upgrade on the OC3D Forums. https://overclock3d.net/news/software/steam-has-finally-upgraded-to-64-bit/