• Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s not a dig against Nvidia, imo. All companies do this if they can. AMD siphoned off chips for enterprise from both cpu and gpu, because the premiums you can charge are so much higher.

    • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ford just shut down the new lightning factory to make batteries for datacenters instead. It’s just a great way to make sure prices keep going up. Create a scarcity and sell at extra markup.

    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      22 hours ago

      $3200 for a 5090 or $22,000 for an H200

      The choice is clear but Nvidia was created by the low-end and enthusiast GPU market…

        • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          GTX 750 Ti was an absolute champ even for playing games at 1440p, and I would argue the GTX 1060/1050 were worth spiritual successors.

          20 years ago you’re looking at an MX440, over AGP if you were lucky.

          In think they had many market segments covered, even with their Shield products.

          It’s clear that where they are going, tech enthusiasts/consumers won’t sustain them, though. They will have to overextend themselves in Corpo bullshit, and either behind just another nightmare conglomerate, or die trying.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Bad news! They’re taking it so far the other way it’s even worse!

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Maybe that’s just something they say, maybe not, if not laws need to change, if so they need reining in.

          • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            CEOs are obliged to act in the best interests of the company (as opposed to shareholders, which I stated previously). 99.99% of the time, that means increase market share, revenue and margins while cutting costs as close to the bone as possible.