My ex-partner had her bookshelf sorted with “perfect disorder”. No two tall books touching, no two red books touching. As chaotic as a bookshelf could possibly be, with a pointed disregard for series or even genres. 100% vibes Based disorganization.
I hated that fucking shelf. I swear it nearly gave me an aneurism trying to find anything on it.
I think bookshelves look better when they’re full of books that are clearly being used, rather than a sterile layout that implies those books are nothing more than decor.
Organizing books by color with no regard for book series is insanity.
My ex-partner had her bookshelf sorted with “perfect disorder”. No two tall books touching, no two red books touching. As chaotic as a bookshelf could possibly be, with a pointed disregard for series or even genres. 100% vibes Based disorganization.
I hated that fucking shelf. I swear it nearly gave me an aneurism trying to find anything on it.
At least it had
A E S T H E R I C S
I swear that’s a hard math tesselation problem
I’d guess, it’s a variation of this problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_color_theorem
It makes perfect sense to people who don’t need to find a book because they don’t actually read.
As I said: insanity
Or people who know what colour their books (so can find them when they need) are and also want their bookshelf to look nice
Found the insane person.
Opinion:
I think bookshelves look better when they’re full of books that are clearly being used, rather than a sterile layout that implies those books are nothing more than decor.
It’s extraordinarily un-OCD. I think that’s the point here. People seem to have forgotten what the D stands for in OCD.
Not being a total slob doesn’t mean you have a disorder.