• neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I remember that rumor for windows 11, I was really hopeful.

    I don’t think they really make money in windows itself.

    Why don’t they just come to linux and sell their server stuff there to keep people in that ecosystem?

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I’m skeptical they could do it in a way that meaningfully inherits stability from Linux. Imagine bolting on their service control on top of systemd or map their registry system to /etc. They either bring all the bad over to Linux or write something that doesn’t support the windows ecosystem.

      • setsubyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They could do what Apple did when they replaced the old MacOS with UNIX, which is they shipped an emulator for a while that was integrated really well. They also had a sort of backwards compatible API that made porting apps a bit easier (now removed, it died with 32 bit support).

        But in the Windows world, third party drivers are much more important. So in that regard it would be more difficult. Especially if they’re not fully behind it. As soon as they waver and there is some way to keep using traditional Windows, the result will be the same as when they tried to slim down the Windows API on ARM, and then nobody moved away from the APIs that were removed because they still worked on x86, which significantly slowed adoption for Windows on ARM.