Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.

I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ringwald but nothing in the bio makes the reference make sense

Costs more than a couple cameras…

If you’re going to start counting shipping costs for the goods then you should compare thet to Amazon

How many poor people flew on the Lolita express?

Turns out the only poor people on that plane were the victims.

Corporations make an addictive and dangerous substance so it is obviously the fault of addicted individuals

Please correct my ignorance, but didn’t Marx think Capitalism wouldn’t last this long?

I mean a slaver does work, it’s just that job shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Wait, so the government/ military industrial complex is behind this website? Lol okay

Not long ago Walmart got fined by the CCP for poor food practices. Instead of saying “we disagree with the judgement” they licked the boot and said they look forward working with the government to resolve the situation. Point is, corporations should be afraid of the government, clearly Google is not afraid of the EU and as a result I expect similar behavior from them in the future.

Conway’s law strikes again!

Lossy compression with no internal mechanism for detecting information corruption.

And the execs that made thr decision to fire in the first place will be punished by giving them bonuses.

“yeah there’s a new giant structure and there’s a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there’s no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego”

IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days

Why is Xavier Becerra on the list? The Democratic governor front runner for California?

The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I’ll just leave it at that. Have a good one

It’s not “bested” by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don’t need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something that “understands” math like a mathematician

You are the one collapsing tool use into a binary when there are varying degrees of competency and hand holding.

So why are you allergic to people talking about the quality of the tools in regards to capability?