• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Eminent domain. As implemented in the US, the government needs to pay for something if it takes it using eminent domain, so it’s not really a mechanism to move wealth around.

    You’d normally use it when the value to the public of something is much higher than to the individual. Like, say someone has a piece of property that they don’t want to sell, but it’s blocking an interstate highway that a ton of people need to use. The value of the one piece of property is limited, but blocking the construction of the highway is a big deal; it lets the government say “you don’t get to choose not to sell”. The government still pays for the property.

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And conveniently they get to tell YOU what its value is. Million dollar property? Nah. Not according to THEIR records. Best they can do is $37k and a huge thank you.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No governments don’t get to cheap out on property values with eminent domain, it often happens that the value gets disputed and a court decides the value. And the governments often lose that battle.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s not just arbitrarily setting a number. There’s a valuation process of some form. This isn’t a new problem; if, for example, someone destroys something else, you need to have some way to determine the value of the thing that was destroyed.