• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Exactly. You are basically saying that circumcised men are disfigured. Are you aware of how inherently negative that description is for circumcised men? Does it not bother you to refer to other men with such disdain and disrespect?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Maybe stop actively supporting the permanent disfiguring of newborns and we might show even your mutilated dick some respect?

      And yes, all circumcised men are disfigured.

        • Linktank@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s so painfully obvious that you are taking this discussion personally. Go touch grass. It’s not your fault that you were disfigured.

    • recursivethinking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’ve got the wrong person. The only thing I did was deliver to you the dictionary definition of the word mutilate. I made no other claims, expressions, or comments on the topic at hand.

      You have shifted to a common logical fallacy called the Straw Man argument. This attempt has failed.

      This conversation is over.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So, let me see if I understand you…

        You post the definition of “mutilation” in response to a previous comment…

        …I assumed, in good faith…that that was your position on that topic (because why else would you have posted it?)

        …and now you’re attempting to distance yourself from that position, by pretending that I’m the one misrepresenting what you posted?

        Buddy…that is a form of strawman argument. You’re now intentionally misrepresenting your own position, in order to misrepresent my response to it.