Traditional initiation is a rite of passage into manhood for young males that is practiced by various ethnic groups in Africa, including parts of South Africa. Among them are the Xhosa, Ndebele, Sotho and Venda communities.
Oh you don’t seem to understand what an ad hominen is either.
Saying “you’re a moron, so you defending mutilation of children’s genital is wrong” would be an ad hominen. Saying “mutilation of child genitals is wrong, you insipid little cretin” isn’t an ad hominen as the argument doesn’t rely on the insult being true. The insult is just an insult. Not all insults are ad hominem. Which you’d know if you’d actually read up on it even once, but you just go with what other people think.
So youre defending cutting off the prepuce of male children, because you’ve bought drank the coolaid and pretend like theres actual science supporting that mutilation. I’ve genuinely looked through the studies. There’s no objective evidence of a circumcision helping anyone unless done at puberty to kids suffering from phimosis. And only a small cut is done, the prepuce isn’t removed.
Try to argue that removing the clitoral hood is a good thing. Try saying that. It’s biologically homologous, although I’m sure you don’t know what that means.
“It’s Nazism to say that my parents shouldn’t have allowed my genitals to be operated on without my consent”
You didn’t successfully bait me though. I’m just having to wait for home deliver before getting out of bed because I’m not gonna get up without coffee, so I’m just killing a bit of time by laughing at people defending the mutilation of child genitals
You can always tell when someone has lost an argument, once they resort to ad hominem attacks.
Oh you don’t seem to understand what an ad hominen is either.
Saying “you’re a moron, so you defending mutilation of children’s genital is wrong” would be an ad hominen. Saying “mutilation of child genitals is wrong, you insipid little cretin” isn’t an ad hominen as the argument doesn’t rely on the insult being true. The insult is just an insult. Not all insults are ad hominem. Which you’d know if you’d actually read up on it even once, but you just go with what other people think.
So youre defending cutting off the prepuce of male children, because you’ve bought drank the coolaid and pretend like theres actual science supporting that mutilation. I’ve genuinely looked through the studies. There’s no objective evidence of a circumcision helping anyone unless done at puberty to kids suffering from phimosis. And only a small cut is done, the prepuce isn’t removed.
Try to argue that removing the clitoral hood is a good thing. Try saying that. It’s biologically homologous, although I’m sure you don’t know what that means.
“It’s Nazism to say that my parents shouldn’t have allowed my genitals to be operated on without my consent”
You didn’t successfully bait me though. I’m just having to wait for home deliver before getting out of bed because I’m not gonna get up without coffee, so I’m just killing a bit of time by laughing at people defending the mutilation of child genitals
The L is all yours here little buddy, at least try to accept it with some dignity.