Like, you come on in here saying that maybe Americans should lead a communist revolution, because they all think the same,
Never once said this.
even though that’s like, a lot of different cultures and everything, and when someone points out that’s kinda racist, your response was to explain communism harder and say that it wasn’t racist because you decided it wasn’t.
I never said that there weren’t a lot of cultures, my point was that those oppressed by present conditions most readily grasp the necessity of resisting them.
And I’ve tried multiple angles for days to see if you at any point would go “yeah that was a little fucked up of me” or even the minimum of “I could see how someone could see that”, and instead you humblebrag about how “no one else has had a problem with it with my many many friends”, and double down again.
You completely invented a point I never made, accused me of racism for said point, and then tried to tell me to apologize for the point you invented. No, I am not apologizing for something I never said.
So I’m pretty sure that wraps up this saga. I can’t get you to admit you did anything wrong because you think you’re perfect
Nope, I know I’m not perfect. I do know that one person inventing a point doesn’t mean I need to apologize for said invented point.
Knowing your type, you’ll probably insist of having the last word anyway, try to pull off that W in the Internet debate box, but I’m not above that either and maybe you’ll surprise me and end this charade.
I’m not going to stand for libel, you’re perfectly capable of admitting that you invented a point I never made. Asking me to apologize for a point you invented is absurd.
We aren’t coming to a deeper understanding together, you’re insistent that if I don’t agree with you that I’m in the wrong. I understand that people can misunderstand or misinterpret my point, and I clarified that I think it’s best to further explain points that are misinterpreted. You took deep offense to that and proceeded to have this back and forth for days with nothing constructive coming from it.
I don’t make assumptions based on race, though, and your insistence that I do is plain libel. You completely misunderstood my point, and no matter how much I further elaborate on it, you try to flip it into being my problem when you invented a strawman to argue against.
I already explained how you made assumptions based on race. You did it twice. You said that you think native Americans would be more in favor of socialist ideologies. That’s making an assumption based on race, cut and dry, plain and simple, period, end of sentence.
I never made that argument, nor was my argument based on ethnicity. I said oppressed people, colonized people, are more willing to resist the system that oppresses them. There’s nothing biological or race-based about that, except in that the US Empire is a settler-colony on stolen land. To deny that is to make a racist statement, akin to saying the US doesn’t have racist systems.
It’s the added level of ignorance to lump in all native Americans as one collective when they are multiple different cultures.
I never once did this, again, more of you making up strawmen to fight. All of the various first nations are currently colonized by the US Empire, please speak with anyone from any of these cultures.
You really didn’t read anything, did you? Just waiting to get that last word on so you feel like you’re right.
I understood perfectly, you keep digging deeper. It’s not about me feeling right, it’s about libel.
Never once said this.
I never said that there weren’t a lot of cultures, my point was that those oppressed by present conditions most readily grasp the necessity of resisting them.
You completely invented a point I never made, accused me of racism for said point, and then tried to tell me to apologize for the point you invented. No, I am not apologizing for something I never said.
Nope, I know I’m not perfect. I do know that one person inventing a point doesn’t mean I need to apologize for said invented point.
I’m not going to stand for libel, you’re perfectly capable of admitting that you invented a point I never made. Asking me to apologize for a point you invented is absurd.
We aren’t coming to a deeper understanding together, you’re insistent that if I don’t agree with you that I’m in the wrong. I understand that people can misunderstand or misinterpret my point, and I clarified that I think it’s best to further explain points that are misinterpreted. You took deep offense to that and proceeded to have this back and forth for days with nothing constructive coming from it.
Removed by mod
Be bigger than that. You don’t need to make up what I said, you’re more than capable of answering points I made directly.
Removed by mod
I don’t make assumptions based on race, though, and your insistence that I do is plain libel. You completely misunderstood my point, and no matter how much I further elaborate on it, you try to flip it into being my problem when you invented a strawman to argue against.
Removed by mod
I never made that argument, nor was my argument based on ethnicity. I said oppressed people, colonized people, are more willing to resist the system that oppresses them. There’s nothing biological or race-based about that, except in that the US Empire is a settler-colony on stolen land. To deny that is to make a racist statement, akin to saying the US doesn’t have racist systems.
I never once did this, again, more of you making up strawmen to fight. All of the various first nations are currently colonized by the US Empire, please speak with anyone from any of these cultures.
I understood perfectly, you keep digging deeper. It’s not about me feeling right, it’s about libel.