洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.orgexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up192cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgopensource@programming.dev
arrow-up192external-linkHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.org洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square65fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgopensource@programming.dev
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 days agoPlagiarism is a form of copyright infringement if there are substantial similarities. Open source licenses build on top of intellectual property laws.
minus-squarem532@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoLicenses like GPL were made to destroy copyright from the inside
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoSo, everything depends on how you define substantial similarities. My opinion is that if there are no copy-and-pasted chunks of code (except for trivial), there are no substantial similarities.
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_similarity
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoI live in another country, however the idea is the same as I wrote above: this all is about direct copying.
Plagiarism is a form of copyright infringement if there are substantial similarities.
Open source licenses build on top of intellectual property laws.
Licenses like GPL were made to destroy copyright from the inside
So, everything depends on how you define substantial similarities. My opinion is that if there are no copy-and-pasted chunks of code (except for trivial), there are no substantial similarities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_similarity
I live in another country, however the idea is the same as I wrote above: this all is about direct copying.