• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You’re assuming that’s a realistic option. I’d also prefer it, but in the meantime we have to deal with reality.

      Note: I live near Boston, and we have decent train service to many urban universities. It’s a great model that we should expand on, but not every school is located in a major city with transit

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        This is such a bad excuse for subsidizing rich kids who got free cars from their parents. I used to live in a rural town in the US and the local college had usable bike paths AND decent access to bus routes

        Ironically it wasn’t until I moved to a city five times the size that I was having 1+ hour bus trips to get across town and bus times were sometimes comparable to walking due to routes being too long.

        Accessibility is 100% a choice by the local government and university admins.

        Edit, just to be crystal clear about feasibility:

        There are situations where enough people have cars (or helicopters if theyre in an extremely wealthy area) that it might make sense to provide amenities for some travelers private accomodations but in most cases busses are often the best solution for universities and colleges because they both have massive seasonal traffic fluctuations (meaning parking investmests go unused 25% of the year and therefore parking fees need to be 33% higher to pay for annual maintenance) and because students are more likely to have issues with maintaining or replacing a car if they even have one.

      • cymbal_king@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I went to a university in a rural area, they invested in local bus services to make it free for students. It was cheaper than building more parking anyways