• boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sure, but as the CEO of one of the most valuable companies in the world, shouldn’t he think about how bad the optics of this are?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      This feels like similar energy to getting outraged about a tan suit.

      Were all involved parties consenting? That’s the only thing that matters.

      Plus on the optics side, we’ve yet to see if being in the Epstein files is bad enough optics for CEOs, so I think “signed something on an adult woman’s boobs when she most likely specifically requested/offered it” is entirely a non-issue.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      literally the coolest thing he’s done

      should sign more tits instead of begging people to stop complaining about AI, maybe stonk price would go up more

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hm gotta be honest, I don’t give a shit about optics, especially since that asshole is plenty bad regardless.