Vayo@sh.itjust.works to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-22か月前YSK that every single thing Donald Trump is doing was predicted in this article published right before the electionwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up11.01Kfile-text
arrow-up11.01Kexternal-linkYSK that every single thing Donald Trump is doing was predicted in this article published right before the electionwww.nytimes.comVayo@sh.itjust.works to You Should Know@lemmy.world · edit-22か月前message-square136fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarezergtoshi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2か月前 Ever since Jan 6 21 it’s been crystal clear where this goes if he wins again. “Wins again” as in violating another part of the constitution (22nd amendment)?
minus-squareRhonda Sandtits@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2か月前It’s not against the constitution for Vance to serve 2 terms as president with Trump as VP, and we all know Trump will cuck Vance to effectively still be acting President.
minus-squareGammelfisch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2か月前Indeed, Medvedev and Putin did the same thing.
minus-squarezergtoshi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2か月前That’s still different from “wins again”.
minus-squareShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2か月前The 12th Amendment explicitly forbids this: no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States
minus-squareRhonda Sandtits@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2か月前Thanks. That gives relief to an issue that has had me concerned. Looks like there is still a bit of debate over how 12 and 22 work together
minus-squareA_norny_mousse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2か月前I meant it from the POV of 2021, so “wins again in 24”
“Wins again” as in violating another part of the constitution (22nd amendment)?
It’s not against the constitution for Vance to serve 2 terms as president with Trump as VP, and we all know Trump will cuck Vance to effectively still be acting President.
Indeed, Medvedev and Putin did the same thing.
That’s still different from “wins again”.
The 12th Amendment explicitly forbids this:
Thanks. That gives relief to an issue that has had me concerned.
Looks like there is still a bit of debate over how 12 and 22 work together
I meant it from the POV of 2021, so “wins again in 24”