• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Manager types are the easiest to replace with a LLM. And we actually didn’t get much closer to AGI the last 10 years.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We live in a country where 77million people voted for a corrupt pedofile imbecile who committed an insurrection that he should have been hanged for live on TV

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    More than most would think. Everytime i see statements like this im reminded of a yellowstone ranger once on trash can lids: “theres a significant overlap between the smartest bears and the dumbest humans”. Then considering the rates of literacy and inability for people to find and discern information sources. I think people will be far more dissappointed in the reality of the situation.

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s why I can’t help but scoff when people say “It’s not real artificial intelligence, it’s just a stochastic parrot”. Like my dude, have you ever interacted with the average person?

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That isn’t what bothers me the most though. Earlier today I read a piece by a “tech journalist” in a paper I normally respect as doing proper work. The mentioned that one of the guys behind Claude says that Claude writes absolutely all their code now. They also said they did a test of one of the most recent models (released earlier this week), and that it wrote “A full Amazon-cloud based page that did various verification and authentication jobs, was about 67 000 lines of code, and was approved by the IT department in minutes in an afternoon”. The last part tells me they have no clue what they’re talking about. They just generated 67 000 lines of potential bugs that works, and which wasn’t reviewed by anyone competent. Nobody reviews 67 000 lines of code in a day, let alone minutes. Just the fact that they thought generating a shitload of boilerplate (most of the lines were likely that) impressive, says enough.

      It’s not your average Joe thinking this is cool that bothers me (it is cool). It’s when allegedly competent people start thinking the LLM actually has any idea what it’s doing.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, I worry about my Claude projects, that do simple tasks, that only I use, generally inside my home network where no one can exploit it not that anyone would want to.

        Meanwhile, these huge companies are writing 50-100% of their shipping products used by millions in some cases.

  • Abrinoxus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    already smart as managers thats why they so popular with management. Of course they will never be actually able to replace management cuz of “reasons”

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Smarter than my cousin Larry? Psht. There’s a boxwood bush outside my bedroom window that’s smarter than cousin Larry.

    But realistically, the machines might be smarter than the average poorly motivated human in certain criteria. Hard to take anybody seriously that disagrees with that position.

    On the other hand, an average human with sufficient and proper motivation? I’m still on team people in that case.

  • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a common saying in reference to why designing bear-proof campground trash cans is so hard: there’s a serious overlap between the smartest bears and the dumbest humans