They don’t, which is why regulation is essential. Not unlike how recycling failed because we expected individuals to behave responsibly instead of regulating manufacturers.
We need to END this shit, instead of ThInK Of tHe cHiLdReN laws that violate our privacy and human rights further, like the “Online Safety Act 2023” whose job it is to link your name, face and ID to the porn you browse.
Nothing is preventing the internet from being exactly the way it was in the 90s. You’re on such a website right now. I, for one, don’t believe the internet is so far gone because 4 or 5 big, popular sites are utterly shit.
But you’re right! So why not ban access to that 10% for kids. You can use the other 90% anonymously. (You can’t actually because streaming services cost money, but you know what I mean.)
They don’t, which is why regulation is essential. Not unlike how recycling failed because we expected individuals to behave responsibly instead of regulating manufacturers.
And you’re already in the database.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_Nanny
disgusting. they should be taking us out of the database
deleted by creator
oh what? WOW! This is so new to me. I’m astonished!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowden_disclosures
We need to END this shit, instead of ThInK Of tHe cHiLdReN laws that violate our privacy and human rights further, like the “Online Safety Act 2023” whose job it is to link your name, face and ID to the porn you browse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Act_2023
like I linked, netnanny and similar software exist. to licence one for every child would be CHEAPER than this bullshit dragnet surveillance.
Stop licking boots.
Just to screw you over if/when you bust out the “YoUlL UdNeRsTaNd iF YoU EvEr hAvE KiDs, ItS HaRd bEiNg a pArEnT” I already have a kid.
You might as well allow kids to drink Tequila and work in meat factories. Healthier than being online.
I’m sorry you feel that your rights are violated because children should be banned from the internet.
read my actual post, there’s a way of doing this without violating human rights.
Fine then. Make it the law that this software MUST be installed on any device accessible to a child. Problem solved.
🤝
Nothing is preventing the internet from being exactly the way it was in the 90s. You’re on such a website right now. I, for one, don’t believe the internet is so far gone because 4 or 5 big, popular sites are utterly shit.
What should be. What is.
These are different things, and insofar as that remains the case, we should act accordingly.
And the “what is” here is that those terrible sites are not the majority of the internet. They’re barely even a fraction of it.
Facebook: 75.27% of social media market share
X (Twitter): 5.75% of social media market share
Time Spent: TikTok (58 min/day) leads in daily time spent, followed by YouTube (52 min/day), Instagram (42 min/day), and Facebook (38 min/day).
I mean it’s a huge fraction of the internet.
SM is not 100% of the internet
All those sites combined still only account for 10% of global traffic. And 10% is not a even close to a majority.
The other 90% is streaming traffic.
But you’re right! So why not ban access to that 10% for kids. You can use the other 90% anonymously. (You can’t actually because streaming services cost money, but you know what I mean.)