• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I remember seeing an article about how the xlsx format description was several hundred pages in length.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      OOXML is over 600 pages, yes. With lots of contradictions and filler words btw. And a “standard” (with scandals abound) that has most of the format as proprietary extensions. And MS Office/365 doesn’t even keep to it, so other office suites never have as good support of the format as MS itself.

      Use ODF to save your documents. MS started their “standard” because of it anyway, fearing losses in their customer base (that bound them to Windows).

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Actually, nothing can really read xlsx expect from Microsoft themselves. They wanted to get an “open” standard so they could be used in European public administration. But they also did it in a way so that nobody else can really implement their whole standard.

        ODT format is way better than DOCX.

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s not true, although nothing can read it with the accuracy of Excel due to the complexity and lack of documentation on certain features.