Tis you missing the point. The person I responded to just condemned everyone opposing globalists, and globalism, as anti jewish, because the far right co-opted anti globalism and identified jews as the culprits, rather than Wall Street, and big money.
Globalism, globalists, is not synonomous with “jews” at all, and that type of reactionary response, to defend or reject completely something unfairly attacked or supported by the right, is what loses credibility, and furthers captured interests remaining captured.
When the republicans want to make the fda worse, and attack them for whatever, we (you,) will defend everything about the fda, even though in reality we know they have for decades been run by pharma board members and executives and lobbyists that have ratfucked them for 40 years. Defend against unfair attacks, don’t defend their fact free campaigns to schedule a plant with demonstrably false arguments, and the like.
Likewise the far right conflating the abuses of wall street in globalism with jews shouldn’t lead you to support wall street’s globalism. Oppose the incorrect conflation of globalism with one group of people when it’s many groups of big monied interests.
It’s about too dumb to have to argue, which makes sense since you didn’t actually make a reasoned argument but a rather nonsensical refutation of an ill defined point.
Literally never heard a single person use that term who wasn’t an Alex jones psycho and they definitely mean Jews when they say it. Even reading your messages here expanding on this, it feels like a fever dream describing positions no one actually holds. I’ve heard a lot of different viewpoints and this is a first for me.
Bottom line, you need a new term. You don’t get to speak the language of racist conspiracy wack jobs and then blame everyone else for noticing.
You have no idea what you are talking about, globalism has been used for 30 years, and there were huge left protests in Seattle and elsewhere as such.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Weird to end a comment by directly addressing yourself, but good on your for recognizing
Pathetic, your argument is basically the same as excusing all epstein conspirators because Q co opted it.
Too dumb to refute but here we are. I recognize your name too, this isn’t your first wrong-headed opinion backed by personal attacks when questioned. Which makes sense because you can’t use reason.
You didn’t make a reasoned argument no, I don’t think you’ve done that in any interaction we’ve had online, you respond with personal attacks to reason. Which is to be expected as none of your opinions stand up to reason. So obscuring the issue with slander is the only way you can “win.” The same way the president “wins” arguments, or the politicians that copy him. All the way down the line to prole at lemmy, emulating the leader. Talk about sad.
I frankly don’t really care what your point is. You’ve chosen to use language associated solely with extreme right wing psychopaths. That’s on you and you alone, no matter how many Lemmy comments you make about it
Your condemnation of globalism as bigoted because the right co-opted it is like excusing the epstein list because of q. It is too dumb to refute, one would think, but here we are. Have fun pushing the electorate into a doomed to fail strategy, and blaming everyone else for it.
Tis you missing the point. The person I responded to just condemned everyone opposing globalists, and globalism, as anti jewish, because the far right co-opted anti globalism and identified jews as the culprits, rather than Wall Street, and big money.
Globalism, globalists, is not synonomous with “jews” at all, and that type of reactionary response, to defend or reject completely something unfairly attacked or supported by the right, is what loses credibility, and furthers captured interests remaining captured.
When the republicans want to make the fda worse, and attack them for whatever, we (you,) will defend everything about the fda, even though in reality we know they have for decades been run by pharma board members and executives and lobbyists that have ratfucked them for 40 years. Defend against unfair attacks, don’t defend their fact free campaigns to schedule a plant with demonstrably false arguments, and the like.
Likewise the far right conflating the abuses of wall street in globalism with jews shouldn’t lead you to support wall street’s globalism. Oppose the incorrect conflation of globalism with one group of people when it’s many groups of big monied interests.
It’s about too dumb to have to argue, which makes sense since you didn’t actually make a reasoned argument but a rather nonsensical refutation of an ill defined point.
Literally never heard a single person use that term who wasn’t an Alex jones psycho and they definitely mean Jews when they say it. Even reading your messages here expanding on this, it feels like a fever dream describing positions no one actually holds. I’ve heard a lot of different viewpoints and this is a first for me.
Bottom line, you need a new term. You don’t get to speak the language of racist conspiracy wack jobs and then blame everyone else for noticing.
You have no idea what you are talking about, globalism has been used for 30 years, and there were huge left protests in Seattle and elsewhere as such.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Weird to end a comment by directly addressing yourself, but good on your for recognizing
Pathetic, your argument is basically the same as excusing all epstein conspirators because Q co opted it.
Too dumb to refute but here we are. I recognize your name too, this isn’t your first wrong-headed opinion backed by personal attacks when questioned. Which makes sense because you can’t use reason.
I didn’t even make an argument you fucking chode
You didn’t make a reasoned argument no, I don’t think you’ve done that in any interaction we’ve had online, you respond with personal attacks to reason. Which is to be expected as none of your opinions stand up to reason. So obscuring the issue with slander is the only way you can “win.” The same way the president “wins” arguments, or the politicians that copy him. All the way down the line to prole at lemmy, emulating the leader. Talk about sad.
Who the fuck even are you?
You don’t get to cancel entire left issues because the right cynically co-opts it. You better hope so anyway.
I frankly don’t really care what your point is. You’ve chosen to use language associated solely with extreme right wing psychopaths. That’s on you and you alone, no matter how many Lemmy comments you make about it
Your condemnation of globalism as bigoted because the right co-opted it is like excusing the epstein list because of q. It is too dumb to refute, one would think, but here we are. Have fun pushing the electorate into a doomed to fail strategy, and blaming everyone else for it.