LibreTechni.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

The Corruption of Open Source

techwontsave.us

external-link
message-square
6
fedilink
36
external-link

The Corruption of Open Source

techwontsave.us

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
6
fedilink
The Corruption of Open Source w/ tante - Tech Won’t Save Us
techwontsave.us
external-link
A left-wing podcast for better technology and a better world.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • tengkuizdihar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

    • Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      no it doesn’t. it only says the weights an information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.

      • tengkuizdihar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Data information == metadata?

        (2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

        imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.

        • Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s your interpeetation. what’s missing for me is “must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable”. with this wording i could just say: “this data is not obtainable” and be done with it.

          • tengkuizdihar@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Youre right damn

  • Mettled@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you mix being an ideologue with software will forever lose.

Open Source@lemmy.ml

opensource@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !opensource@lemmy.ml

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

  • Open Source Initiative
  • Free Software Foundation
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Software Freedom Conservancy
  • It’s FOSS
  • Android FOSS Apps Megathread

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

  • !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_software@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
  • !linux@lemmy.ml
  • !technology@lemmy.ml

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 568 users / day
  • 1.23K users / week
  • 4.37K users / month
  • 9.62K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 41.8K subscribers
  • 1.48K Posts
  • 17.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan@lemmy.ml
  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
  • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org