cm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1869
arrow-up1869imageJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlcm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 hours agoThat chicken’s parent laid an egg though so it wasn’t the first egg laying animal.
minus-squareJackFrostNCola@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoCorrect, not the first egg laying animal, however the first chicken was hatched from a chicken egg.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoNo, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.
That chicken’s parent laid an egg though so it wasn’t the first egg laying animal.
Correct, not the first egg laying animal, however the first chicken was hatched from a chicken egg.
No, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.