The simple math of the Yard-Sale Model shows that if everybody started out with equal money in a fair economy, the outcome tends toward one person holding all of the money. The cool graphical simulations on this page demonstrate why.

  • oyzmo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yup! That is why salary increase always is in percentage; the more you have, the more you get! 😡

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m not arguing theft doesn’t happen, at all, and neither is the article. In fact, it explicitly states that the yard-sale model doesn’t represent reality, and doesn’t even claim to do so. It simply shows one underlying phenomenon where wealth accumulates naturally in a random system.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think the fact is most people wouldn’t do certain work if they were wealthy enough to have a choice in the matter. The system relies on extreme poverty in order to coerce people into taking jobs they otherwise wouldn’t.

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yard-Sale model also explains the Network Effect: People will flock to where the masses are because they will have a higher access to interact with folks than in isolated networks. Thus silos will eventually emerge: See Meta+Discord, etc…

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Another simulation… that’s mainstream in american society… Landlords Game – IE what’s now Monopoly. By definition everyone starts with the same amount of money, and it ends with one person massively ahead and everyone else going bankrupt.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Well yes, but have you tried just throwing the board across the room when that one person gets massively ahead and you land on Pacific avenue with a hotel on it?

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yes, if you make your economy “people with money gain more money” then this is the endgame

    • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’ve demonstrated exactly how the system works. Statistically a few players will be lucky and become very rich. They’ll be looked at as “built different”. All the other poor players will try to emulate them as if they can beat the system by achieving some virtue like working hard enough or having innate skill rather than realize the system is mathematically impossible to beat.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Absolutely, and the headline here isn’t that extreme wealth inequality is not the result of human nature, greed, or anything. It’s actually an emergent mathematical property of the system itself. It’s unavoidable, even if everybody acts honorably. Proof by physicists that capitalism is wack.