(If you know where I stole this from, I love you.)

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Are you just talking about the way the app launcher uses the whole screen?

    yep

    That seems like the silliest thing to care about

    well, I find it jarring. It’s my preference/feeling/aesthetic and I’m entitled to it. There are enough ways to do that don’t take up the whole screen that my opinion must be fairly common. Macs have spotlight, the start bar that has existed forever, Krunner…

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Of course you’re entitled to your preference, no debating that.

      I found the happily short-lived windows “metro” interface similarly jarring like you describe, but the gnome equivalent has never caused me any difficulty for some reason.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I found the happily short-lived windows “metro” interface similarly jarring like you describe, but the gnome equivalent has never caused me any difficulty for some reason.

        That’s interesting. what separates the two for you? Because I dislike them both for the same reason. Is it the subtle blur and transparency for gnome?

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think that’s it: simply blurring the background instead of just disappearing, it makes it feel like it’s not “gone”; just not the current focus, so to speak.

          I also was on Ubuntu for a lot of the time while they were fooling around with “Unity” so I’m sure my experience is skewed compared to a clean pure gnome setup.