original, saw this somewhere else too. ddos stuff. this one blames ru for archive.today mess. sounds about right. didn’ intend it to look like an announcement here. it kind of did. post based on ars story, apparently. who knows

  • CombatWombat@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately, they’ve allegedly modified the contents of some archived articles, so even though they may do better to archive, nothing archived is of any value because it cannot be trusted.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      So are they removing all other websites that post lies or modify their articles to suit their narrative at times?

      Fox news? MSN? CNN? BBC? Reuters? AP?

      Why the sudden urge to validate the archives? How many articles have been proven to be modified?

      Seems like they’ve been wanting to remove an entity the empire doesn’t control and they’re using this as a cover to do it.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        that’s exactly one of the main reason they use archive sites for citations. but when an archival site does that it becomes useless.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What if somebody used archive.today to bypass a paywall and then archived that using Web Archive? (So we’re sure the content stays the same)