• irmadlad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m not so much worried about ‘vibe coding’ as long as the dev actually knows the validity of the code presented in the LLM. At that point, the LLM becomes the assistant, not the dev itself. However, if I were to speculate, this dev team didn’t, got called on it, didn’t know how to respond or validate the code, so they closed up shop.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The term ‘vibe coding’ I think was originally about generating and using code without understanding it

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Well, I have used LLM to do code for in house type stuff. Very simple. In that scenario, it’s fairly good. I’ve found that LLM are good at compose files for instance. But that’s much different than producing a piece of software for thousands of people to use with confidence. Especially when dealing with anything 'arr and the mitigation that takes place to operate that in a secure, private, and anonymous manner.

      • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Yeah doesn’t sound like vibe coding if you actually go through the necessary dances anyway, i.e double-check the produced code and validate it and actually understand it and the domain.

        Edit: But almost nobody does. Because then you’d rather just write it yourself and save time, money and energy…