fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAmericans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1830
arrow-up1830external-linkAmericans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 day agoLasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I’ve heard.
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·21 hours agoI think you’d need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn’t be enough, or so I’ve heard.
minus-squarebetterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·54 minutes agoSo what you’re saying is that I have an finally have an excuse a good reason to get a high-powered laser.
Lasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I’ve heard.
I think you’d need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn’t be enough, or so I’ve heard.
So what you’re saying is that I have an finally have
an excusea good reason to get a high-powered laser.