A newly released plot of the Hubble Space Telescope’s altitude shows just how quickly the observatory has descended in recent years.

The post on Bluesky by astronomer Jonathan McDowell is a stark reminder that Hubble is heading back to Earth, possibly sooner than previously thought, as its orbit decays.

Hubble was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990, carried in the payload bay of Space Shuttle Discovery. While it remains capable of pointing its instruments and has returned breathtaking imagery over more than three decades in orbit, it cannot raise its altitude.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I mean if it just needs to grab it and boost it, it should be a simpler job, right? No real payload.

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Grab, boost, maintain, upgrade. There is a lot that would be needed to keep Hubble functional. It hasn’t been maintained since like 2009. And I know we have crewed space craft, and I’m assuming there is something out there capable of grabbing and boosting it. If it was simple, it probably would have been done post shuttle era.

      Though I’ll admit I’m no expert, I just like space shit.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        NASA and SpaceX looked at using Dragon to service Hubble back in 2022. In 2024 NASA decided that was a bad idea because of potential damage to the observatory. Not sure how that was the better option instead of at least trying to save it, but that’s the conclusion they had at the time.

        • just2look@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeah, I know. That sounds to me like they were trying to accomplish the boost without equipment designed for the task. I agree that a damage risk is better than of burning up, but they also thought they would have more time. They had forecast deorbit in the mid 2030s I think.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The only equipment designed for the task was the Shuttle. Hubble was designed and built for the Shuttle’s service bay. So we haven’t had equipment “designed” for this task since the Shuttle was decommissioned in 2011.

            The whole point of the research in 2022 was to see about designing new equipment that would work with Dragon.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              if it’s any consolation, in the al gore wins 2000 timeline they’re on Super Shuttle, the next generation of SSTs, and multiple Hubbles now orbit.

              Along with a moon base and a stable climate.

            • just2look@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s basically what I said above. Designing a shuttle replacement is a huge task. I can’t imagine a dragon capsule will be easy to build out to perform the same functions. It’s unfortunate that all the attempts to build a shuttle replacement have failed.