SSTF@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 days agoAdministrative task managementlemmy.worldimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1538
arrow-up1538imageAdministrative task managementlemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-square☂️-@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-28 days agoi legitimately don’t see it. i figured the calendar would not make any sense but the worst i see is jpeg.
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoNot how March was in 1998 or 1999. Also the shadow leading from the firearm along the arm is also bogus.
minus-square☂️-@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 days agoit’s insane we have to cross reference calendars to figure it out now.
minus-squareTower@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 days agoThat’s absolutely March of '99. There’s a legitimate question as to whether the calendar says 1999, given all the jpeg, but it did exist.
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoDerp I’d checked 1998 and then didnt check 1999 after I saw the shadow.
minus-squareJetpackJackson@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 days agoIt has too much jpeg on the year numbers imo compared to the month name, March is clear but the year looks like 1/958
i legitimately don’t see it. i figured the calendar would not make any sense but the worst i see is jpeg.
Not how March was in 1998 or 1999. Also the shadow leading from the firearm along the arm is also bogus.
it’s insane we have to cross reference calendars to figure it out now.
That’s absolutely March of '99. There’s a legitimate question as to whether the calendar says 1999, given all the jpeg, but it did exist.
Derp I’d checked 1998 and then didnt check 1999 after I saw the shadow.
It has too much jpeg on the year numbers imo compared to the month name, March is clear but the year looks like 1/958