

So you first write this:
If I see people seriel downvoting, I’ll ban them.
And then this:
I don’t care about upvotes/downvotes
But you do care because you’re banning people for “serial downvoting.” Which is what? What do you consider “serial downvoting”? Two downvotes in a row? Three? Five? Or is it just '‘this person downvoted this and that, I Iike the post and the person should be banned because they do not agree with my opinion’’ kind of thing?
I also change headlines to fit the articles sometimes, because headlines are shit nowadays.
Change headlines from other people’s posts instead of just asking them to change their headlines? Yuck. Glad I found this post and you; thanks to that, I know I should avoid your ‘‘community’’ and you as a person on Lemmy.
You just sound like a power-tripping moderator, the ones we usually see on Reddit.
EDIT: I found it odd that every comment pointing out your ‘‘serial downvoting’’ comment that contradicts got exactly one downvote. So out of curiosity, I went and checked. Did not surprise me to see that you downvoted every single comment. Five of the six pictures were from you downvoting at the exact same time (at 5:59 PM):
So with your logic, you should now be banned from this community for ‘‘serial downvoting.’’











I’m a bit confused as to why this is related to 1984. I understand banning AI “boyfriends” and “girlfriends” could be seen as a form of censorship, though. But I also think it’s kind of a good thing; some people genuinely believed these AI were their real relationships and might avoid any real relationships.