I recently heard a story of a horse slowly starving on a grass field, because the owner insisted that the horse was fine on the field and apparently animal services were fine with it???

Anyway, I am not sure if a grass field can provide enough food for a horse long term.

Doesn’t anyone know more? I just have a story.

Well he isn’t… he just kinda dismisses gender if i understood him right… like he listened and choose this.

It means that he believes a sentient human can not transition by their own choice but he gets transition a sentient AI as he wishes.

And honestly, I think that highlights the issue if transition means he gets to have a woman submit to his every word, he supports it. So any transwoman who are into old white men and fulltime submission kink? There is an opportunity!

Always remember, he believes that trans people can’t transition as they can’t change their biological sex.

But he calls an ai without biological sex and with a male coded name, the female version of that name. So trans people can’t change their gender because of biological sex buz he can change the gender of an ai.

It is clearly not a hijab.

Yeah. Same.

Fair enough while I have opinions.

But it makes me wonder if OP actually used idle for very lazy or if they never actually read their own post.

Very lazy = idle?

No? Or is my english bad?

I think there are 4 reasons:

1. Most people are very horny
2. It people are very online
3. A lot of it people are obsessive with it, consequently easily identifiable as such.
4. Other professions aren’t as identifiable, or online.

Yeah! Once a teacher was mad at me for being too quick and when she checked to scold me, everything was correct…

Oh 100%.

Which is a reason to switch.

A closed source OS, as universal as windows, shouldn’t be legal.

Switch now!

Edit: I mean, switch to Linux. Obviously macOS is closed source and not an improvement.

Also they sold your data to the next broker.

No programmers.

Losers who see ai as the opportunity to compete with people who are passionate about something else than fame or money.

Weird example but ok.

And no, it is not only historical. I stated that in my original comment and I invite you to look at left wing politics but some “left wing” politician’s position on some random issue, but a widely supported position by the left wing community. You will see that they are all in opposition of hierarchy.

But let’s take your weirdly racist example, where is the hierarchy?

That is nonsense.

The left was coined by its opposition to the monarchy while the right supported it.

So left has been currently and historically speaking in opposition of hierarchies and in favor of equality.

The right consequently has been in favor of hierarchies.

Every significant AI company makes their best efforts to stop it.

Someone should have told him that Elon “stopped” it by trying to make money from it.

I think all of these actions are morally wrong but could you tell me how they are objective and not subjective? A reasonable person seems to be a person and consequently fundamentally subjective.

In my mind, I acknowledge that i only ever wanted to have sex with women. But i would be an idiot to make being straight part of my identity because if I would ever meet a man that I could and would love, I would just have made it more difficult for me to accept that and there is zero gain in identifying as straight. I don’t think we need to identify our sexuality, we just need to be willing to accept ourselves and go with the flow.

Saying “I am 100% straight!” Seems to be a good way to have an identity crisis when you find someone attractive that doesn’t make you feel straight enough to accept it.

All but my work computer (they don’t let me) run some version of debian.