Well take their wealth. They got their labours worth of resources and spent them.

I don’t think there are many meme places where this meme would be appreciated for what it is.

I think it is rather questionable to express that any of the real world practices of the porn industry is “outside the scope” when judging the real world practices of hooters. I think it is shameful that hooters doesn’t have very clear guidelines. I think it is shameful to make “jokes” that could make someone uncomfortable in such a dynamic. And okay, the man is probably lying to his wife and speaks in vague terms. He probably wants to look at the servers, but does he do more? That is your assumption. Understandable one but an assumption. So let’s grant that he makes weird jokes to the servers. Is he really less of a creep when he would watching Mia Khalifa porn? Of course, as Mia probably wouldn’t know that he specifically is watching, he would cause less harm in a sense, but the question is not harm reduction but being a creep.

I don’t see how you conclude that e.g. the man in the post plans to bend the rules at all.

The rest of your comment is disappointing. You know that I didn’t mean that a customer can’t sexually assault a server or former server. I meant that if the server quits, they are not longer being sexualized as part of their job and unless people are fucking creeps, their former employment should continue to sexualize them.

Also well it is a regrettable career. That doesn’t mean you have to regret it. But it is certainly regrettable like any other career. And women like Mia Khalifa have expressed regret in the past and yet while she was expressing regret, porn videos of her were widely available and consumed. That is what I was talking about. Not that the career is always ending in regret.

Thanks, I enjoyed explore the topic with you. Ch00f is doing a good job that expressing their thoughts. I am not convinced but I respect their effort and skill.

Yes there is a difference.

A customer of porn could share that porn long after that actress quit the industry and has publicly expressed regret.

A customer of hooters can’t force the server to continue to be sexualized at hooters.

But let’s focus on your example,

A customer could break rules at hooters, therefore consume porn and don’t go to hooters?

I guess my question would be creepy in perception or creepy in behavior?

Perception? sure, fine. Behavior? I think sexually dehumanising behavior would be what we would call creepy.

But I think a call to action (what the original comment was) to not be perceived as a creep… idk.

I would agree with you on that notion, while i think strip clubs are weird as fuck, but then we talk about personality and not behavior.

The original comment is a call to action, it is about behavior and not personality.

So it is less creepy to engage with porn than hooters while porn is arguably far more exploitative and dehumanising than hooters because the creep is interacting with the woman?

I really don’t know if I agree there and again, I think very poorly of hooters and their customers, I am not defending it.

I don’t know what to think about this.

While I don’t intend to visit hooter, strip clubs or anything alike and I think people can be creeps even if they are acting completely within the consent of others.

But how is a man who wants to go to hooters a creep but a man who wants to consumes porn not? The exploitation of women in porn is arguably worse because while they consent to the recording (i mean if not… I don’t need to continue my point) oftentimes they sell all their rights and lose all control over the recording. Consequently there is no backing out if they no longer want to be seen like that. (Of course, there are other issues) If you work for hooters, you know wtf is going on before you were hired and if you quit, you are not longer exposed.

So what is creepy about hooters but not about porn?

Is it the simple fact that the man seeks out some kind of sexualized interact with the woman?

Oh interesting, technicalities like? I wrote to a bunch of politicians and I was assured that they rejected it on principle.

Maybe they lied to me. But why would they lie to me but not the general public? Maybe the EU is a bunch of politicians and they all have their own opinions.

“Europe… the guys that want backdoor into all encrypted communications” is a weird thing to say considering that every attempt of such a law failed because they didn’t have the majority.

“Europe… where a minority of politicians have continually failled to get a backdoor into all encrypted communications” would be far more accurate.

As a serious question, what makes you feel like you have to correct a deliberate choice of a word? What about that choice makes you feel like that? What bothers you about it?

So apparently I go from “knowing nothing” to “guru” and back daily.

And remove telegram too. Telegram should be avoided by any it person.

Because the creator is clueless. Telegram with someone who encrypts their /home??? Telegram is hiding the encrypted chat from the average user. That is literally all the reason I need to avoid it.

And they place bitcoin of all things in the tor network and full disk encryption tier… bitcoin… where everything is traceable and which is more mainstream than /home encryption.

I like this meme because hahaha Jordan Peterson dumb. But also, It makes me feel better for liking butts more.

I love how this paints the affirmation as some random unprovoked act and not the counter reaction to the harassment, because if they would paint it as what is it, a counter reaction to the harassment, then it would become obvious that the “live and let live” approach is under attack by bigots and the affirmation is an attempt to counter the attack and reinstate “live and let live”.

Just that master doesn’t actually makes much sense in most git workflows.

If you understand master like you would understand the master/slave relationship in old tech, then of course, master seems to make sense until you realize that there is no slave in that sense or in name. Additional, master is rarely doing anything but having release or hot fixes being merged into it. Arguably dev is the master of the branches.

In other words, master was always a bad name. It is silly to rename it because “racism” but it is at least equally silly to act like master is a much better name than “main” or “live” or “prod” or … Fuck, the list is long.

Bad management