Because people don’t have unlimited money, I guess.

And back skin that ripped open…

Ripped open back skin and that flag reminds me of something.

“You” lol I am not german. But don’t feel bad, you haven’t been right about much until now.

Germany is actively working on being independent from Russia… that was literally part of my original comment. It is work in progress… and sidenote, germany used to buy their uranium from France but also from Russia and China. So “allied” countries are both true and false. But i am not surprised that you are simplifying that issue because that is all you did.

I love how I never said nuclear was bad but gave the reasons of the German government.

Talk about cope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_France

France has stopped. But they can easily pick it up again.

Fucking hell.

Edit: it is also very funny that you don’t understand why energy density is not the only important feature for energy sources for war scenarios, instead of e.g. having direct access to it instead of being dependent on other nations… in a war…

I love how people act like german government is against nuclear. When the actual situation is the following:

Reality:

1. Yes, Nuclear is not popular with the German public and might not for good reasons
2. The German nuclear power plants were planned to shutdown and weren’t maintained to continue to run for a long time.
3. Continue to run the nuclear power plants would require a lot of investment
4. Germany is and was moving towards renewable energies for independence of nuclear and Russian gas anyway.
5. Building new nuclear power plants take years.
6. Germany choose to invest in renewable energy instead.
7. Germany doesn’t have mines for nuclear materials to run a nuclear power plant independently, unlike France.
8. Germany has domestic coal. Germany has coal power plants. Germany can run coal power plants independently. That is important for the military.
9. So germany chose a bit more coal short term; and coal and nuclear free future. Germany is literally uses less coal now than ever.

So germany has been reducing nuclear, coal and natural gas power usage.

Bubba tells me that it might not only be his own

It is from 2023. I don’t know when they changed what. But the last time I used it, women had to start the conversation but they could set a question to ask automatically, skipping the first message

It is bumble. She has to start.

I didn’t intend to push you in a corner and I can assure you that “kink play” is very aware of power dynamics and consent.

I think they are trying to make a nuanced take but the nuance is not really there in that specific case, causing them to argue accidentally for something that they don’t agree with. But I could be mistaken and miss something huge and there is an important nuance.

I don’t think anyone argued for “going into people’s houses to check”.

But the question about “freely consenting” is grooming and power dynamics. So if you are not in favor of these things, what was said that you have an issue with?

Just as a reminder, the topic was what the problem with incest is.

I want you to ask yourself something.

“What is my point? Why am I arguing in favor of this?”

I don’t know your answer to the question and I assume your current opinion is not one that you thought a lot about. It is just a spontaneous thought.

I think that because I am wondering when I read your comment, why are you defending the right to have incest for some “fucking weird” people when you were just made aware of the danger of grooming, especially in that context?

They knew […] is bad. they were told not to.

If they didn’t know what is good and bad, how would they have known that listening to the rules and following them, would have been good, and not doing so bad.

For a bit more complex form validation (ofc only for user convenience and not security), you need js.

Auto correct had a difficult task to complete to make it somewhat understandable.

:(

If I am correctly informed… it is not history…

I am not that old and I remember doing that.

I just explained to you how your own response confirms my point but be upset over someone making fun of you for stating the headline of their reference as some interesting insight.

You didn’t even bother to argue my point. You repeated the headline of the article that I send you. Are you sure that I need to learn that?

I would have given you a proper response if your response would have been. Calling something “controversial” is literally saying that there are conflicting opinions on the matter, which means it is NOT no brainer.