There was a case in which a monkey took a picture and the owner of the camera wanted to publish the photo. Peta sued and lost because an animal can’t hold any copyright as an human author is required for copyright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute
As you also find in the wikipedia article, this case is used to argue that ai generated content is not by an human author and consequently not copyrightable.
I wish Alan Turing would get to enjoy modern life
Totally true but I would say:
The society that hounds everyone about everything.
And frankly, it isn’t surprising. In a world of diversity of opinions, you will be criticised whether you do by someone. We all might share 99% of the opinions of everyone else, but that 1% is not always the same 1%.
Because people don’t have unlimited money, I guess.
And back skin that ripped open…
Ripped open back skin and that flag reminds me of something.
“You” lol I am not german. But don’t feel bad, you haven’t been right about much until now.
Germany is actively working on being independent from Russia… that was literally part of my original comment. It is work in progress… and sidenote, germany used to buy their uranium from France but also from Russia and China. So “allied” countries are both true and false. But i am not surprised that you are simplifying that issue because that is all you did.
I love how I never said nuclear was bad but gave the reasons of the German government.
Talk about cope.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_France
France has stopped. But they can easily pick it up again.
Fucking hell.
Edit: it is also very funny that you don’t understand why energy density is not the only important feature for energy sources for war scenarios, instead of e.g. having direct access to it instead of being dependent on other nations… in a war…
I love how people act like german government is against nuclear. When the actual situation is the following:
Reality:
So germany has been reducing nuclear, coal and natural gas power usage.
Bubba tells me that it might not only be his own
It is from 2023. I don’t know when they changed what. But the last time I used it, women had to start the conversation but they could set a question to ask automatically, skipping the first message
It is bumble. She has to start.
I didn’t intend to push you in a corner and I can assure you that “kink play” is very aware of power dynamics and consent.
I think they are trying to make a nuanced take but the nuance is not really there in that specific case, causing them to argue accidentally for something that they don’t agree with. But I could be mistaken and miss something huge and there is an important nuance.
I don’t think anyone argued for “going into people’s houses to check”.
But the question about “freely consenting” is grooming and power dynamics. So if you are not in favor of these things, what was said that you have an issue with?
Just as a reminder, the topic was what the problem with incest is.
I want you to ask yourself something.
“What is my point? Why am I arguing in favor of this?”
I don’t know your answer to the question and I assume your current opinion is not one that you thought a lot about. It is just a spontaneous thought.
I think that because I am wondering when I read your comment, why are you defending the right to have incest for some “fucking weird” people when you were just made aware of the danger of grooming, especially in that context?
They knew […] is bad. they were told not to.
If they didn’t know what is good and bad, how would they have known that listening to the rules and following them, would have been good, and not doing so bad.
For a bit more complex form validation (ofc only for user convenience and not security), you need js.
Auto correct had a difficult task to complete to make it somewhat understandable.
I think you are right and yet so wrong.
My problems with ai aren’t unique and I am no special snowflake who see through the matrix while everyone else is distracted. I am just a dude. I really doubt that the points tell I will bring up, is anything boring as generic arguments against ai.
My problem with data theft is not based on the concern that artists has the rights on their work. I want them rewarded for your labor but in this case, it is not my primary issue. It is the hypocritical nature of company entirely based in IP law stealing IP protected work. I hate that the system is not ripping them into piece like Nintendo rips an online super smash tournament into pieces. It is so obviously “rules for thee, not for me”. You can claim that capitalism is causing that but I really don’t think capitalism requires this shit. Sure the rich and powerful are rich and powerful in capitalism because of capitalism, but special pledging for the elite existed in every system we have tried.
I hate ai because people invest in the dumbest applications for it. LLM are trash. Voice cloner??? Wtf. Image generation? Why?? But for medical applications in which we have comparably amazing clean data, let’s invest into that a little bit. But x billions into LLMs please.
I hate ai because the most brain dead application gets the most usage and people will tell you how it is bad but use it anyway. Then they obviously don’t have the computing power to run a decent local model and just pipe any personal or confidential information into the online service that tells you that the data will be used for training, so it can be leaking back out to other people.
I hate ai because it is literally everything bad about society (e.g. nonconsental nudes) and tech (e.g. data collectors) and their interaction.