Then that is not what the article is about…

How do you currently store your passwords? I would also consider that a third party with an adittional atack surface if you are considering the passkey location one.

Also your argument

(if you ignore the operating system, web browser, network protocols, etc., but that’s part of using the tech).

is faulty. That is because passkeys exist in part to mitigate those atack vectors. Mitm, a compromised browser or client, etc. is less of an issue with passkeys. The information transmitted during an authentication can not be reused on another authentication attempt.

I don’t agree on passkeys complicating things either. For me the authentication-flow is not more complicated then KeePasses autofill.

Assuming one can be ‘tech savy’ enough to not fall for fishing is bad. There are quite advanced attacks or you might even just be tired one day and do something stupid by accident.

What’s that now? The weak point is the user’s ability to implement MFA and biometrics? The same users who couldn’t be bothered to create different passwords for different sites?

You don’t expext the user to ‘implement’ mfa or biometrics. You expect them to use it. And most places where a novice would store passkeys don’t just expect but enforce it. It is also way simpler to set up biometrics on one device compared to keeping with a good password strategy.

You can set a pin on most passkey devices so that it doesn’t serve the authentication without it.

Assistant District Attorney Michael Mattson said Woeltz and Duplessie allegedly lured the man to New York from Italy by threatening to have his family killed.

Really a stretch of the word lured…

Why would they, there’s like five of them…

I was hinting at your last sentence. It seems, they do indeed target a lower sdk: https://gitlab.com/fmd-foss/fmd-android/-/issues?show=eyJpaWQiOiIzNTQiLCJmdWxsX3BhdGgiOiJmbWQtZm9zcy9mbWQtYW5kcm9pZCIsImlkIjoxNzI3NjgxMTN9

F-droid also warns me, the target sdk ist too old and automatic updates will not be possible.

(Thank you for the post anyhow, I didn’t know the app existed before)

The app seems to target an older sdk, right?

If your needs are not that complex, you could maybe stick with kde and use kate.

Every 5mins seems insane. Why do you need to schedule it that frequently?

Also, I wouldn’t shy from keeping the database on the same, fast storage as the OS, even if that’s flash. Move to an external SSD when you can. HDDs have such long seek times.

Very much true. I installed Immich on my dads Synology for him and compared to my own setup at home the speeds are abysmall (it even crased a few times during the first indexing and ML run). I suspect a major part is that the whole os runs on an hdd.

If you put the database on an sd-card just ensure you make frequent backups somwhere else. I wouldn’t trust flash storage to keep my data safe.

Premium Shitpost mein Herr.

Right, he who does not rely on someone elses DNS-server shall throw the first stone!

Afaik Synology supports Btrfs which I honestly prefer at this point if you don’t need filesystem based encryption or professionall scaling and caching features.

Germany did this too up until a month ago https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/573659 .

Could you elabotrate why?

It gets better:

Packages are always up to date thanks to Arch Linux’s rolling release nature, offering good up to date bugs.

Thats what all my other services use though and I don’t know how I’d connect them to traefic.

Because I don’t know how docker works, the .yaml given by nightscout is using traefik and I don’t know how to remove it without breakting the nightscout container.

My Nginx is running in the same local network but on a different IP so there should not be a collision with the traefik ports.

How do I connect to the container without traefik (from my local network)?

When I remove all the traefic references and then run docker ps I get

CONTAINER ID   IMAGE                                                            COMMAND                  CREATED         STATUS                  PORTS                                         NAMES
[removed]   nightscout/cgm-remote-monitor:latest                             "docker-entrypoint.s…"   6 seconds ago   Up 5 seconds            1337/tcp                                      nightscout
[removed]   mongo:4.4                                                        "docker-entrypoint.s…"   37 hours ago    Up 5 seconds            27017/tcp                                     docker-mongo-1

But I can’t reach it under dockerIP:1337.

With Immich it had 0.0.0.0:port as its IP and I was able to reach it that way.