• neox_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m like this post but I use GNU Guix System instead of Gentoo and GNU Boot instead of the old fully free Libreboot (and I have my own appartment lol).

  • Fleur_@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago
    • under investigation for ordering child sex dolls under their real name to their home address with their bank account and posting pictures with their face in it to reddit
  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The extent some people go to refuse their privacy being stepped on. These people like this are pathetic. /s

    BRO JUST LET THEM DO WHATEVER THEY WANT YOU’LL BE FINE AS LONG AS

    Y O U H A V E N O T H I N G T O H I D E

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Frankly, I think the people with more to hide are more virtuous than I. Labor organizers, activists, etc. If you’re working to overthrow my country, awesome. Best of luck to you.

      But it’s also fair to say most of us will not truly benefit from writing a custom boot loader and after a certain point this is just a hobby.

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      At least there are cameras tracking everyone’s movements now.

      And local cash-accepting taxi companies have been replaced by two cooperative companies, so that loophole is almost closed.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    20 hours ago

    all the 3-letter agencies pool their resources
    billions of dollars are dumped into the project
    several years later they manage to decrypt all of this guy’s communications
    it’s nothing but chats about how to encrypt shit

  • eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah yes, a Linux teenagers power fantasy. Hardened Gentoo and Selinux beats deblobbing btw, noob.

      • eldain@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You can’t impress me with a bog standard Gentoo. If you want to show power, build a fortress. At least put some tripwire you mostly trip yourself on (program that keeps an encrypted hash database of your system files to find intrusion changes, needs an update with every update of course or it alerts only your negligence).

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    check the IP logs

    Its all encrypted? This guy uses VPNs and Tor?

    Presuming that Mossad can be topped with a subscription to ProtonVPN or a Tor browser is adorable. Hell, presuming nobody in the intelligence services is familiar with Linux is even more adorable. “We’ve got everyone at the NSA fooled because we’re Arch users”. Yeah, sure buddy. What do you think these professional computer nerds are doing in their own free time?

    Where do you even think encrypted applications come from?

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      most of these security agencies effectiveness is just in the myth’s they’ve built around themselves of actually being effective.

      mossad in particular, just has a complete disregard for killing innocents and a really good propaganda wing to suppress all their fuckups.

      most killers are not right in the head, they act on pure emotion, they post “i am going kill X” online to their social media of choice the night before going to kill X…it’s dumb as shit. that’s how low the bar is on utilizing violence

      fact is lone wolf threats are practically unstoppable, especially if they have a modicum of competency

      this is also why it’s said killing gets easier/“first ones the hardest” etc. even if your not some sociopath (which, most people as a whole arent)…once you know and understand just how easy it is to kill people and get away with it…lot of the worlds problems start to look like they have very easy solutions…

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I mean, tell it to Jeffery Epstein. The man was pulling strings halfway around the world with his endless supply of blackmail and bribery.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Also lots of killers seek psychiatric help voluntarily (and are often sadly ignored). For a sane, moderately competent person it’s easy to plan the perfect murder or terror attack – it’s a different thing to carry it through because a sane person also has mental guardrails.

        Mossad is effective because Israelis are ruthlessly trained to dehumanize anyone who’s an obstacle to their goals.

    • DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      From security agencies, presumably…

      Got me? No!

      Security agencies create encryption for their own usage. This means they want it to be mathematically as strong as possible, to protect their secrets from enemy security agencies. Why would they backdoor their own protection system?

      They’ll just go through the side door instead.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The Snowden docs proved that the NSA was intentionally weakening some encryption standards to make them amenable for cracking.

        Then there’s also the constant pressure from the FBI to make it law that encryption technologies must have backdoors. These are both public record.

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think they’ll be prodigies or anything but they probably know literally one or two tricks or weaknesses that they heavily depend upon.

      So you can never really feel secure (that’s not to say take no caution).

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s referring to binary blobs. A windows exe might be a binary blob.
      These are distributed compiled. Even if the project is open sources, the binary blob might have been generated by a compromised compiler.

      This is one of the reasons the XZ Utils compromisation went unnoticed for so long. One of the compressed files used for testing contained malicious code that would be included in the build artefacts (IE, the final compiled binary) under very narrow and specific circumstances.

      So “deblobbed” means absolutely everything in the OS was built & compiled on their computer from original source code

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Thanks. But I don’t understand why any of that ensures that the compiler isn’t compromised? Do you mean they have presumably vetted the compiler themselves first? This is something that would be incredibly time consuming to do, assuming we are talking about gcc or something equivalent, which, I mean if you’re compiling an OS…

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The concepts they’re referring to have more to do with Ken Thompson’s Trusting Trust essay. Laurie Wired recently came out with an episode about it. It’s a rather intractable problem in computing, and unfortunately, even with the best practices to overcome it, you can never be 100% sure that your system is completely free of compromise.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s true.
          But the idea is that there are no precompiled binaries that are implicitly trusted.
          So you CAN vet all of the code and artefacts, and if something doesn’t seem right you can trace it back to the code and understand exactly why, instead of seeing a black-box binary and coming to the conclusion “it’s doing something it shouldn’t, but I don’t know what or why”.
          The idea is that you are in control of the entire build process.

          But yes, it would be extremely time consuming to vet GCC, build it from source and (I guess) compare checksum/hashes against published binaries. Then vet all of the source code of everything you need to compile for Gentoo, then compile that and compare checksum/hashes etc.
          Which is why it’s in a 4chan meme.

          But I imagine governments agency will have some deblobbed Linux installs with the technical capacity to vet all the code and artefacts

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ah yes… Government… Yeah they seem extremely,… very competent… For sure, for sure . But yeah , thanks see ya

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Tower’s explanation of blobs is kind of strange and not really correct. In a general sense a binary blob is just a situation where you have open-source software that is combined with proprietary components.

      Most relevant example to the meme is that the Linux kernel is open-source, but can sometimes contain drivers that are proprietary and don’t have source code available. Those proprietary drivers would be the blobs.

      As a counter-example, the linux-libre kernel that devfuuu linked to, is a version of the Linux kernel that has had all the blobs removed.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    302
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Well, we raided his mom’s house and confiscated all his cobbled-together e-waste.”

    “And!?”

    “His drives were encrypted. Apparently he ‘applied PQC patches to dm-crypt himself’, whatever that means. All I know is that it made the guys from NSA scream. There was nothing we could do.”

    “So we’ve got nothing?”

    “Oh no. He happily gave us both the keyfile and the passphrase.”

    “So…?”

    “No warez, no CSA, no political manifestos or illicit recipes. Not even tax evasion - it’s not like he has an income. Just… copyleft source code as far as the eye could see.”

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      1 day ago

      copyleft source code is a telltale sign of communism, thus anon can be associated with Big terrorist like the Antifa.

    • piyuv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      ·
      1 day ago

      I lol’d at this. But seriously, privacy is a fundamental human right. You don’t need to have something to hide to assert your right of privacy.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The NSA dude screamed in ecstasy because someone finally used his dm-crypt patches.

    • rirus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only Asymetric encryption, like PGP has Problems with Quantum Computers. Symmetric, like AES, used by dm-crypt is not affected by Quantum Computers. It doesn’t rely on multiplied big prime numbers or stuff like that.

      • zeca@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Is it a proved theorem that quantum computers dont have an advantage for AES, or is it just unkown?

        • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The question isnt whether quantum computers have an advantage over regular computers (they pretty much always do for code cracking as the parallel superposition computation is some crazy shit that changes cryptography forever) instead the question is whether or not AES-256 is able to resist our current quantum compute and how long it can do that.

          Its a simple equation, as long as it takes longer than the lifespan of the universe to compute with our most powerful supercomputers its considered good encryption. However as computers get more powerful, the projected time decreases potentially to the point of human lifespan time frames. Thats when it becomes a problem and the standard fails.

          Currently AES is quantum resistant but it almost certainly won’t be forever. New standards are gonna need to be adopted at some point.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I legit spent the afternoon the other day installing Linux on my first non-Raspberry Pi machine since 2007. It is a 13 year old laptop with NVidia GPUs (2). It went perfectly smoothly and Linux sees both GPUs. I tried Megabonk on it and it runs at 60FPS maxed out. I encrypted the drive. Bless you, Pop!_OS

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        I run Gentoo.

        It’s made my fundamentals stronger.

        It allows me to run the minimal number of codepaths.

        Every now and then it makes me happy. Sometimes proud of myself. All because I solved some problem that was helped by the mindset Gentoo had set up.

          • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t know the size in bytes, haven’t cared much about it for some time now. It also very much depends on the definition of minimal. My minimal != your minimal.

            I’m referring to use flags, which allow me to not have a bunch of features I don’t use compiled to begin with. Less code - fewer headaches.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gentoo is fun and a nice way to learn more about computers. Their wiki and their community was really good when I was into it, I’m sure it still is. But compiling everything from scratch is quite demanding of your CPU and your time, so it’s not really something that you run as your daily driver for long.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          All lies.

          After install, the distro just works.

          I’ve had more failed upgrades in Ubuntu.

          So if you have base Linux skills, you will have a rock solid distro, which may take a while to update, but you can limit the number of CPU cores for compiling, and therefore use the PC even during that.

          And USE flags are so addictive, while being just strings in a single file.

          I believed I would learn more about Linux when daily driving Gentoo. But all I learned is how to run three commands to keep the system updated, including compiling the kernel. And it just works.