• xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    304
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Well, we raided his mom’s house and confiscated all his cobbled-together e-waste.”

    “And!?”

    “His drives were encrypted. Apparently he ‘applied PQC patches to dm-crypt himself’, whatever that means. All I know is that it made the guys from NSA scream. There was nothing we could do.”

    “So we’ve got nothing?”

    “Oh no. He happily gave us both the keyfile and the passphrase.”

    “So…?”

    “No warez, no CSA, no political manifestos or illicit recipes. Not even tax evasion - it’s not like he has an income. Just… copyleft source code as far as the eye could see.”

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      1 day ago

      copyleft source code is a telltale sign of communism, thus anon can be associated with Big terrorist like the Antifa.

    • piyuv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      120
      ·
      1 day ago

      I lol’d at this. But seriously, privacy is a fundamental human right. You don’t need to have something to hide to assert your right of privacy.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The NSA dude screamed in ecstasy because someone finally used his dm-crypt patches.

    • rirus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only Asymetric encryption, like PGP has Problems with Quantum Computers. Symmetric, like AES, used by dm-crypt is not affected by Quantum Computers. It doesn’t rely on multiplied big prime numbers or stuff like that.

      • zeca@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Is it a proved theorem that quantum computers dont have an advantage for AES, or is it just unkown?

        • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The question isnt whether quantum computers have an advantage over regular computers (they pretty much always do for code cracking as the parallel superposition computation is some crazy shit that changes cryptography forever) instead the question is whether or not AES-256 is able to resist our current quantum compute and how long it can do that.

          Its a simple equation, as long as it takes longer than the lifespan of the universe to compute with our most powerful supercomputers its considered good encryption. However as computers get more powerful, the projected time decreases potentially to the point of human lifespan time frames. Thats when it becomes a problem and the standard fails.

          Currently AES is quantum resistant but it almost certainly won’t be forever. New standards are gonna need to be adopted at some point.