This is kinda the same idea but made for what you originally asked for: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

This is so painfully obvious that I have a hard time assuming good faith argumentation when people come up with the “population question”.

Reading such articles, I feel like a hermit or something. I never stopped doing these things they describe as “going back to” and thinking about it, there really isn’t any such algorithm I ever used or felt a need for.

We also have a dedicated community here: https://slrpnk.net/c/fiction

Yes, this is a good observation, but the question is what is really the cause of this? Clearly it isn’t economics alone. I would guess it is mostly due to specific family dynamics and this wouldn’t necessarily extend to non-biological extended “families” of your choosing.

It’s likely Cloudflare related. Some of the larger instances are behind that, but many of the smaller ones aren’t. Cloudflare isn’t only a problem for VPN users, so its a good idea to avoid those instances as a user. You can still interact with their communities via Federation.

No, they found some billionaires to do it 😉

Has a strong smell of: https://xkcd.com/1172/

There is also Google maps integration. Sure, it’s not mandatory anymore, but if you install the official Signal app on a phone with Google play services installed, you are effectively not running an open-source app anymore and this potential backdoor is also not noticeable with reproducible builds.

F-droid has strict rules in place to prevent these sort of things for good reasons, thus the original comment is not entirely wrong in saying that an app that claims to be open-source, but can’t be made available on F-droid is a red-flag.

The external Google dependencies I am talking about are loaded into the client not the server, so that’s an entirely different issue.

I’ll leave it up to you to decide if that is bad or not, but one of the reasons the Signal app can’t be put unaltered on F-droid is because it loads in external dependencies from Google at run-time, which can also be altered by Google at will with any Android update.

No, if your system can’t support 3rd party clients properly, it is inherently insecure, especially in an e2ee context where you supposedly don’t have to trust the server/vendor. If a system claims to be e2ee, but tightly controls both clients and servers (for example WhatsApp), that means they can rug-pull that e2ee at any point in time and even selectively target people with custom updates to break that e2ee for them only. The only way to realistically protect yourself from that is using a 3rd party client (and yes, I know, in case of Signal also theoretically reviewing every code change and using reproducible builds, but that’s not very realistic).

Now admittedly, Signal has started to be less hostile to 3rd party clients like Molly, so it’s not as bad anymore as it used to be.

You could write a review on Bookwym: https://books.solarpunk.moe/

Is there a link you forgot to add or further commentary about how this relates to Solarpunk?

This place is ok for it, I just think your introduction is a bit too nebulous.

The Solarpunk Manifesto already sums up a lot of this. Otherwise I feel your question is maybe a bit too open ended to gather ideas here? At least I struggled a bit it coming up with a response ☺️

Certainly that is the aim here, but since there is just a lot of negative stuff happening right now, it is something we also have to deal with.

Loads of people working for these companies are also on special visas that have been described as modern slavery… so maybe they are culpable of signing up for such jobs/visas, but once you are in such a setup the threat of immediate deportation to some 3rd world country is quite real.

There is the MLS standard now that was explicitly developed with e2ee group chat applications in mind. From what I have read so far, this new standard seems well regarded by cryptography experts.

Telegram’s encryption isn’t open source, so no one can verify it’s soundness or risks.

This is not true, it is available in the open-source Telegram clients.

What you probably mean is that it is using an unusual and not well studied encryption algorithm. This means you need to be a real cryptography expert to spot flaws in it.

Telegram justifies this with a bit of FUD about well known encryption algorithm being NSA sponsored etc, but when cryptography experts did look at Telegram’s homegrown algorithm they were less than impressed.