And yes, I know the shading isn’t ideal…

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d be surprised if this installation generated anything useful at all, since shading any part of a single panel essentially disables the whole panel, which in turn, especially in small setups like this, affects the whole array of panels.

    • Jako301@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Newer panels usually don’t have that big of an issue with partial shading, but it definetly isn’t optimal.

        • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s fascinating to see the difference in reaction in the post here, vs. the post it links to where they’re saying exactly the same thing that you and I are saying.

          No idea what the difference might be.

          • Steve@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yea bypass diodes help a little, (and they have existed for a very long time, nothing to do with “modern” panels), but any shade effectively shuts down the entire panel, and unless the charge controller is happy with much lower voltage, the whole series string will stop producing.

  • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a horrible setup - even minor shade can disproportinally affect the power output.

    They should get rid of the plants growing around the panels

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They should, yes. But modern panels have bypass diodes that somewhat mitigate partial shading.