Be better.

Or a permanent solution, it’s all about perspective.

You would if you pay the subscription.

The question for smartphones has been tried in court IIRC. Basically, police can compel you to unlock your phone with biometrics, but cannot compel you to unlock it if it’s a password, and the difference is your fingerprint is something you have, whereas a password is something you know. Your fingerprint is subject to the fourth amendment and your password is subject to the fifth.

So when it comes to video footage, the password is protected, so they’d need to break the encryption or the password, they couldn’t compel you to reveal it.

No, OpenAI is sustained by investment money, not actual revenue from products.

That’s like saying you’re glad you got paid less because that means you’ll pay less taxes.

Vinegar might do the trick, and that’d safe in a super soaker. Make it salty for extra impact.

But you see, it’s a network of private cameras, so it’s completely different!!

I think it’s a similar car to hers. She wasn’t in the area at all, and had proof of that.

I imagine a sufficiently strong acid could discolor it pretty quickly.

They can only get it with a search warrant. If everything is encrypted with a sufficiently strong password, I think the court precedent is that they can’t compel you to reveal the password.

To get a warrant, they need to convince a judge that it’s necessary to prove guilt in a specific crime, which means they need at least reasonable suspicion before even asking for the footage.

Casually asking just for general knowledge, but what would be the penalty if someone, say, accidentally destroyed one of these? What about 10?

Agreed, and prison should be for rehabilitation.

Perhaps prisoners could be released in one of two states: completed time or rehabilitated. The latter carries a much lower chance of recidivism. Maybe the first iffense could be hidden regardless, and expunged entirely after some period of time (10 years?), whereas on the second offense, both are searchable.

IDK, but I do believe in forgiveness.

I don’t think that’s true, do you have evidence of that?

Ah, I thought you were talking about electronic payments completely taking over.

Eh, my kids are the smartest in their class, and the only real option is to put them a year ahead, where they’re likely the “dumbest”. They’re still in elementary school, so I would really rather they spend their time enjoying their childhood instead of trying to catch up in school.

I was the same way as a kid. I did all the extras, was in “honors” classes, did “AP” (college credit) classes, and even went to the local community college while in high school and got a 2-year degree simultaneously with my high school diploma. I’m not some savant or anything, and if I skipped a grade at the wrong moment, I might have merely graduated a year early and not gotten that 2-year degree. My friend group also would’ve been impacted since I’d be a year different from everyone my age.

This is on the disc brake, so the grenade would drop as soon as you ride away since it would not fit between the frame and the wheel, dropping the pin and exploding the grenade probably before they have a chance to run.

Yeah, screw the bike, I want the grenade!

When building an application, consider all options. Serverless is great for background tasks that can be broken up into smaller pieces that you would otherwise need to scale up for main instances to handle, or scale up/down additional instances. It’s great for running background reports that you do t want to build a bunch of routes for.

I would never choose serverless for the whole app architecture, but I might choose one host over another of the distinguishing feature was serverless. It’s really nice to have the option.

Yeah, I 100% respect Python for standing up to this nonsense. DEI should mean teaching people about their biases so we can do a better job of goving opportunities to those best able to do the job, instead of whoever is liked by the hiring team.

Grants like this shouldn’t have stipulations about how the project is run, only about the priorities, if any.

My point is merely that DEI programs can be discriminatory, not that they are.