There’s an important distinction between not caring about race in the sense that you treat all people you encounter with equal consideration, and not caring about race in the sense that you disregard all racially based socio-economic concerns. A person flippantly expressing a lack of caring reeks of the latter.

If a user needs Photoshop in their workflow then Linux isn’t an option for them. That is a problem with Linux, from a user perspective.

Who’s at fault for that problem is a different question, and I’d be surprised if LTT ever say that Linux is to blame.

I cancelled my Netflix several years ago literally the very first time I got an error that too many people were watching or a screen wasn’t authorized or whatever the specific “you can’t share your account anymore” error was at the time.

The fact that account sharing was tacitly allowed was literally the only thing keeping the value proposition of having the account afloat.

I would be absolutely floored if enough people were on board to even make a noticable difference for just one week. Boycotts in the gaming space have been hilariously ineffectual, historically.

At least most responses seem to be pushing back on OP’s implication that this is some kind of double standard.

Does no one else notice that both of these responses point out that how the recipient feels makes a difference? They’re addressing the unfortunately most common experience, but also including that how you feel or if you’re okay with it is important.

As for the “bias” being presented here, there’s nothing wrong with responding to unequal things unequally. Women are far more likely to experience unwanted touching and that’s just the sad reality.

also pretty wierd that he’s so about open source, and yet doesn’t consider linux a “social warrior” project

isn’t it about giving to society? if not, what is linux about?

He literally speaks to this point in his comment. He states that the goal of the Linux kernel project is to develop the Linux kernel, period. The social benefits from it being an open source project is a side effect. Just because it’s widely viewed as a “social good” doesn’t make it automatically a champion of every social issue that happens to show up in the course of its development.

There is absolutely nothing in the article to indicate the family’s political leanings or how they voted.

Having working production database config and credentials in your local .env, as appears to be the case here, is equally wild, and basically begging for something like this to happen.

…am I having a stroke? What does that last sentence mean?

So is Ori and the Blind Forest.

She has also been around for a long time at this point, building more fans all the while. Debuted in 2007.

Reject team-based multiplayer. Play a fighting game!

Most of them? Care to provide some examples without the ridiculous “don’t work” hyperbole? Clearly most Sega games were functional, otherwise no one would’ve been playing them.

I stopped buying Campbell’s or any of its subsidiary brands a few years ago when they both raised prices and reduced the size of the can.

They were underhanded about it too because they made the cans slightly taller so it wasn’t obvious that they had less volume.

Now I’m wondering if anyone has ever labeled salt as organic.

The Steam Deck OLED has a 90Hz display.

Article is written confusingly as the author does not seem to understand that the speed quoted, ~1500m/min, is the descent rate and does not include airspeed.

The plane’s actual impact velocity was certainly much higher than that.

The very smart people working on their architecture and chip design are very much not the same people who are working on their desktop software.

No, I believe it’s just other characters whose original creators are dead offering commiseration.