• real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most importantly they were cheap and fast to build, that’s why there are so many of them. Unfortunately most houses didn’t fare that well into the 21st century

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Left wing architecture brought us Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village

    Originally (1947) prioritized for WWII vets (and very much just for white people for like a while after it was built), the development today has some of the most sought after rental apartments in the entire city, cause it’s a great place for community

    11k apartments from 14th st to 23rd st, 1st ave to ave C

    Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuyvesant_Town–Peter_Cooper_Village

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      It also gave us Pruitt-Igoe…

      I think execution is a lot more important than the architectural style in the success or failure of projects in that era

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    State owned housing is yet another tendril the state uses to control people. When the powerful control your basic necessities like food and shelter, they basically control whether you live or die. And when they control whether you live or die, they control you completely. Not too different from capitalism, really, except the people dying are dissidents instead of the poor.

    Thankfully, humans are actually quite adept at obtaining or constructing their own food and shelter. It’s only the violence of the state that prevents them from doing so. Once we solve that issue there will be little to no hunger or homelessness as there are many possible solutions to these problems.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This actually looks amazing, well designed city blocks with ample public space and green areas. Furthermore a lot of leftist architecture is transit oriented and walkable. New Jersey can learn a lot from this, hell if they had this instead of endless sprawl it would actually be a good state to live in.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Those were not amazing to live in. There were often no shops, no restaurants, no culture, no nothing. And the buildings had extremely thin walls, there was no privacy, you could hear everything the neighbours were doing. It’s possible to reconstruct them to make them quite nice and livable, but they were not designed that way from the beginning. It WAS depressing. The problems were not caused by it being leftist, though. It was the shitty totalitarian regime with central planning and absurdly incompetent leaders.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Also, you know what I care about? The quality of the building and the inside of my apartment. You give me an ugly concrete building and let me deal with what’s inside the walls of my place, no worries! I’d rather have reinforced concrete that will last my lifetime than particle board that won’t last two decades.

  • OldGrayDog@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    That’s in China and hardly anyone actually lives there. I don’t remember the whole story, but it’s kind of a waste.