nice little blogpost where someone reviews music players

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Agreed. It is my player of choice, though being it is pure Python, it uses a lot of resources for a music player. If I was tight on ram or using a slower CPU, I’d probably go with something leaner.

      • flameleaf@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What a strange take. When I first switched to Linux in ~2009 I tried a ton of other players. Weirdly, Quod Libet was the only performant option back then. Amarok, Rhythmbox, Banshee, Clementine, etc all chugged to load my library with their UIs freezing for upwards of half an hour before I had something usable. Quod Libet just worked.

        Right now it’s using 598MB with a music library of ~31K songs.

    • jcarax@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I absolutely adore being able to click into and between genres and artists to get to albums and songs instantly. I want to ultimately move back to MPD, maybe Navidrome or Subsonic, but… I just love Quod Libet.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      i’ve always been a “organize everything at the file system level, and just play folders on demand in winamp” type guy… so when i couldn’t find a good winamp replacement after switching to linux, i ended up on quod libet and got used to organizing everything via tagging

      quod libet was a bit overwhelming at first and forced me to fix a lot of broken tags, but totally worth it.