• vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hearing those arguments for how many years now? Right …

    The day Gabe is bo longer there things may get ugly, may.

    But, Valve is not publicly traded, or has to cater to shareholders in any way. That is the reason they are still who they are.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They run a good service platform and aren’t as greedy as they could be, but they’re still not safe.

      Use them, but no fangirling. They’re a business.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d be completely in agreement of what you are saying if it wasn’t for the fact that there are so many people acting like Steam is the worst platform in existence every time they get brought up. People are awfully quick to suck Tim Sweeney off for only charging 12% and fill up the comments with whatever the opposite of “fangirling” is.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          47 minutes ago

          Yeah, that’s going too far, but I understand the reaction to fanning over Valve.

          There are a bazillion historical examples of why one should use, not trust, big businesses. They are entities to make transaction with, not people, and they will tighten the screws even if it takes decades.

          This is doubly true in the software business.

          And if the Valve superfans look at the world in 2026 and somehow don’t see that, I honestly don’t know what to tell them. They’re in such a completely different world than me I don’t know where to start.