• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The legitimate government of Afghanistan requested support. Afghanistan had many factions and infighting, but the legitimate government specifically requested support, which the soviets responded to.

    • David_Eight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s not what I asked though. Did the majority of the Afghan people want the Soviets to intervene? Its my understanding that most Afghans didn’t want the Soviets there, given how they overthrew the government a few years after the Soviets left.

      Was my definition of colonialism wrong?

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        The majority of Afghans did not want any one thing, it was highly factional. The government that invited the soviets in was a revolutionary government itself in the first place, from the winning faction at the time. Do you think the majority of Afghans wanted civil war? Without a clear majority, you have to focus on what’s actually good and legitimate.

        Your definition wasn’t necessarily wrong outright, just not at all applicable to the soviets in Afghanistan. Your definition is severely lacking in the fact that colonialism is extractionary and set up for that purpose, for example.