Outdoor recreation often slips into what I call an achievement-based relationship with nature. I’ve been guilty of it myself. Whether it’s “bagging peaks”, racing to finish the AT, or stamping the land with machines and monuments, the focus shifts from ecology to ego.
Being obsessed with Peak Bagging is not Solarpunk.
Nature is not your personal obstacle to challenge yourself against, it is a shared place of discovery you trample when you only see it as a place to endlessly, exhaustingly conquer.
In my experience, the more goal/achievement oriented a person is in their relationship to nature, the more likely they are to care for it.
Appalachian trail thru hikers, for example, are far more likely to know and follow leave no trace principles, and will enforce these principles on each other via informal social tactics. Hikers who cut the handles off their toothbrushes to save a few grams of weight would be appalled at the prospect of leaving their garbage behind at a campsite or on the side of the trail. The people who dump their garbage everywhere tend to be people who come to the forest for a party, or to have a picnic.
Similarly, the Everest climbers leaving all the trash are chasing the vague goal of “get to the top”. But high end alpinists leave no trash behind. They leave no fixed lines, and do not carry bottled oxygen, and so cannot leave the bottles. Whatever the underlying motivations, they want to achieve a significant feat, and they want to do it “in good style” - in a way that meets their community’s approval. And the community is quite clear that good style requires leaving no (or very little) trace. Climbing Everest with fixed lines and sherpa and oxygen would be embarassing for any serious alpinist.
In my experience the more goal/achievement oriented a person is the more hollow and superficial their relationship to nature is.
You are essentially using a “No True Scotsman” fallacy here on hiking and mountaineering culture. I don’t doubt there are lots of really passionate nature lovers who are deep into hiking and mountaineering. Of course there are, but the point is that the underlying ideology undermines the pursuit of connecting with nature that the entire culture of outdoor sports in the US seems oblivious too.
These are not the people I am comparing to, I am comparing the obsessive peak bagging, personal goal oriented culture of outdoor sports to people who protect, spend time in and love the natural landscapes right outside their door instead of looking at instagram and fantasizing about climbing that one mountain they really need to climb to cross off their list that is hundreds of miles away while ignoring the nature outside of their window. I don’t see the culture of most outdoor oriented communities in the US as anything other than weaponized FOMO meant to push people into an endless loop of needing to conquer more and more nature to prove themselves to their peers.
To put it another way, I don’t see most outdoor sports culture in the US as meaningfully different than downhill skiing culture, that is these things are fun, beautiful, challenging and rewarding to participate in but they aren’t a process of becoming more intimately connected with and supportive of nature.
Gotta say, No True Scotsman right back at you. Plenty of hippies around me like to leave their shit and beer cans around the hot springs they drop acid in - though I’m sure if you asked them, they would tell you about how intimately they connected with nature.
Honestly, this sounds like you are just judging people for enjoying the outdoors in a different way than you enjoy the outdoors. I basically am one of those people you describe, but I have literally never posted on IG about what I do, and have not been active on social media for years. I do the things I do because going on epic, challenging missions is personally meaningful and memorable to me, requires me to challenge myself and see how I can overcome those challenges, and creates new relationships with others and deepens my existing relationships.
You can enjoy the sunshine in your local city park by sitting on a bench. Or you can play soccar with your friends. Neither way of interacting with nature is “wrong”
Again you have explained your relationship with nature as almost entirely about you and your experience.
Both of those things are very different than participating in a culture of needing to conquer nature to prove yourself.
And you are describing listening to crickets - which is all about you and your cricket-listening experience.
I could easily say that the people playing soccer are doing so to fulfill their ego goal of “conquoring” the other team and proving themselves. But if I did, the people who showed up to have fun playing soccer with their friends would look at me weird.
No it is about me and the crickets, it is about placing the value of witnessing over the value of conquering something with my body. The latter is inherently more selfish than the former.
Witnessing is an experience. That’s your experience. You are conquoring the desire to interact with nature, fulfilling your ego goal of passive acceptance.
I joke - but really, go to a hiking trail sometime and tell all the people who show up to hike they are all selfish and egotistical for wanting to hike the whole trail instead of just stopping whenever the mood strikes them and going home. I feel like if you were to actually talk to people about these views, you would realize how weird you sound very quickly
What a tortured twisting of my words, of course witnessing is an experience, it is an experience that brings you outside yourself unlike a physical battle with the limits of your body that draws you inward.
Why would I do that?
Because it would be an experience that brings you outside yourself, giving you the opportunity to directly witness the beauty of the human experience through others’ point of view.