• orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hmm, considering how cheap these are to make (relatively speaking) could it make a good decoy? Basically set a bunch of these up in random places away from anything important with remote on switches and when missiles start flying power them up one at a time. They’re more expensive than the anti-missile drones (those are supposedly about $1000 a piece) but they might be more effective in their own way.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Possibly but you could just put any radio signal up for a decoy, you don’t need something this fancy. Radar is just radio waves. The fancy part is collimation of the beam and sensing of the return beam. That’s what costs money.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        OK, so a basic radio antenna that emits the same kinds of signals a radar would? Why isn’t every army already doing this? Sounds so obvious. Imagine if these things could start attracting missiles that cost millions to fire.

        • teft@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Who says we aren’t? Electronic counter measures and electronic counter counter measures are a large part of modern warfare.

          It’s a cat and mouse game.

        • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Some kinds of signal? How about the 5ghz WiFi band that uses some of the same frequencies as radar, I thinks the the channels above 100