• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Damn right. And the solution isn’t to substitute another unreliable trading partner like China. By all means, make deals that make sense, and I think for the most part China will keep them, until they don’t. They will always look to gain an advantage and wield the hammer when it suits them, including hostage diplomacy. I have more confidence in Europe, Indo-Pacific, and expanding new markets in Africa and South America.

    But strengthening self-reliance and removing internal barriers can only pay dividends. And working with reliable partners that keep their agreements is the only way forward. The only thing that has long term value in trade is trust.

    • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Trading with China is fine, just not putting all our eggs in the China basket. As long as they’re one trade partner among many it’s a much more equal relationship.

      But yeah, favouring internal trade should be a priority.

      • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Diversify, diversify, diversify. And don’t be too dependent on outside stuff. The neoliberal shit needs to end. All it took is one jackass to bring it all down.

    • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s not substitution, it’s expansion. It’s better to have more options, even (or especially) when some are unreliable.

      Completely agree with your points, though.